[AusNOG] FW: [apnic-talk] IPv4 address exchange
Matthew Maxwell
matt at xembler.org
Tue Apr 19 10:07:53 EST 2011
Hrmm, /32...that gives me a terrible idea - IPv4aaS - a heady mix of L2L (in
Cisco parlance) VPN and NAT to permit use of single addresses from a GRT
permissable block.....scary thoughts.
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Chris Kawchuk <juniperdude at gmail.com>wrote:
> "I have a /32 I can let you have, real cheap....." =)
>
> - Chris.
>
> P.S. Hence why I'm looking for /24's - suitable for eBGP announcement to
> the GRT.
>
>
> On 2011-04-19, at 9:54 AM, Matthew Maxwell wrote:
>
> > Do we place bets on how long it takes for people to start flogging off
> non-contiguous /28's or 29's then have buyers complain about reachability
> issues?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Chris Kawchuk <juniperdude at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > My Bid is already in. Looking for a pair of non-contiguous /24's.
> >
> > Portable Address Blocks, for the win..! =)
> >
> > - Chris.
> >
> >
> > On 2011-04-19, at 8:54 AM, Matthew Maxwell wrote:
> >
> > > Thinking of IPv4 black markets gives me a warm fuzzy feeling.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Skeeve Stevens <Skeeve at eintellego.net>
> wrote:
> > > Oh crap.
> > >
> > > ...Skeeve
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sk
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20110419/ffe213bf/attachment.html>
More information about the AusNOG
mailing list