[AusNOG] FW: [apnic-talk] IPv4 address exchange

[Matthew Moyle-Croft]

On 19/04/2011, at 9:37 AM, Matthew Maxwell wrote:

Hrmm, /32...that gives me a terrible idea - IPv4aaS - a heady mix of L2L (in Cisco parlance) VPN and NAT to permit use of single addresses from a GRT permissable block.....scary thoughts.

Why scary?

There's whole industries doing this already to allow you to have an IP in a different region to circumvent region based content licensing agreements.

MMC




On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Chris Kawchuk <juniperdude at gmail.com<mailto:juniperdude at gmail.com>> wrote:
"I have a /32 I can let you have, real cheap....." =)

- Chris.

P.S. Hence why I'm looking for /24's - suitable for eBGP announcement to the GRT.


On 2011-04-19, at 9:54 AM, Matthew Maxwell wrote:

> Do we place bets on how long it takes for people to start flogging off non-contiguous /28's or 29's then have buyers complain about reachability issues?
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Chris Kawchuk <juniperdude at gmail.com<mailto:juniperdude at gmail.com>> wrote:
> My Bid is already in. Looking for a pair of non-contiguous /24's.
>
> Portable Address Blocks, for the win..! =)
>
> - Chris.
>
>
> On 2011-04-19, at 8:54 AM, Matthew Maxwell wrote:
>
> > Thinking of IPv4 black markets gives me a warm fuzzy feeling.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Skeeve Stevens <Skeeve at eintellego.net<mailto:Skeeve at eintellego.net>> wrote:
> > Oh crap.
> >
> > ...Skeeve
> >
> > --
> > Sk
>



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20110419/719360b2/attachment.html>