[AusNOG] SPAM-MED: Re: Data Retention and CGNAT - educational exercise
Paul Brooks
pbrooks-ausnog at layer10.com.au
Thu Mar 26 14:44:21 EST 2015
On 26/03/2015 12:51 PM, Paul Jones wrote:
>
>
> I think the same applies here – I respect people who see the world differently, but
> I think it’s nuts not to be providing dual stack IPV6. It just depends on what
> people’s vision is, and how prepared they like to be for the future. I realise there
> is only a limited number of hours in the day and business demands quite often get in
> the way, but having said that, some companies seem to live in a perpetual state of
> pending chaos! So long as they manage to keep just ahead of the avalanche behind
> them then everything is right with the world….
>
This.
If you like to be standards-compliant, then https://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp177
BCP 177 = RFC 6540 - IPv6 support required for all IP-capable nodes - If it doesn't
include IPv6 capability as well as IPv4, then its not a RFC-compliant Internet-capable
device.
Its a shame there isn't an equivalent for the interconnecting networks - if the
network doesn't enable IPv6 as well as IPv4, then its not a RFC-compliant Internet
service, and shouldn't be called 'Internet'.
My comment this morning actually wasn't specifically about IPv6, and I never suggested
IPv6-only was feasible yet.
It was more about the application of energy - there are only so many hours in a day,
only so much energy that can be expended on finding solutions. If some of the energy
and time expended on making CG-NAT work incrementally better was instead funnelled
towards making IPv6 ubiquitous, then the CG-NAT stop-gap wouldn't be needed and could
be consigned to the 6th level of hell where it belongs.
P.
>
>
>
>
> Paul.
>
>
>
> *From:*AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] *On Behalf Of *Kristoffer
> Sheather @ CloudCentral
> *Sent:* Thursday, 26 March 2015 10:34 AM
> *To:* Alex Samad - Yieldbroker; Damien Gardner Jnr; Mark Andrews
> *Cc:* ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
> *Subject:* Re: [AusNOG] SPAM-MED: Re: Data Retention and CGNAT - educational exercise
>
>
>
> Absolutely. Commercial interests are incentivised by commercial outcomes. If IPv6
> resulted in a commercial outcome to the majority of commercial interests then you
> would see IPv6 holding a majority over IPv4. But that isn't the case is it?
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From*: "Alex Samad - Yieldbroker" <Alex.Samad at yieldbroker.com
> <mailto:Alex.Samad at yieldbroker.com>>
> *Sent*: Thursday, March 26, 2015 10:27 AM
> *To*: "kris at cloudcentral.com.au <mailto:kris at cloudcentral.com.au>"
> <kris at cloudcentral.com.au <mailto:kris at cloudcentral.com.au>>, "Damien Gardner Jnr"
> <rendrag at rendrag.net <mailto:rendrag at rendrag.net>>, "Mark Andrews" <marka at isc.org
> <mailto:marka at isc.org>>
> *Cc*: "ausnog at lists.ausnog.net <mailto:ausnog at lists.ausnog.net>"
> <ausnog at lists.ausnog.net <mailto:ausnog at lists.ausnog.net>>
> *Subject*: RE: [AusNOG] SPAM-MED: Re: Data Retention and CGNAT - educational exercise
>
>
>
> Hmm not sure that’s absolutely true.
>
>
>
> Commercial interests do what’s best for them
>
>
>
> A
>
>
>
> *From:*AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] *On Behalf Of *Kristoffer
> Sheather @ CloudCentral
> *Sent:* Thursday, 26 March 2015 10:23 AM
> *To:* Damien Gardner Jnr; Mark Andrews
> *Cc:* ausnog at lists.ausnog.net <mailto:ausnog at lists.ausnog.net>; Kristoffer Sheather
> *Subject:* Re: [AusNOG] SPAM-MED: Re: Data Retention and CGNAT - educational exercise
>
>
>
> If the customers needed it then the ISP's would be doing it.
>
>
>
> When it is needed every ISP under the sun that wants customers will be doing it.
>
>
>
> Thats the commercial and actual reality.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20150326/fbe315ad/attachment.html>
More information about the AusNOG
mailing list