[AusNOG] Australian senate passes controversial anti-piracy, website-blocking laws

[Paul Wilkins]

On 23 June 2015 at 19:13, Paul Brooks <pbrooks-ausnog at layer10.com.au> wrote:

>
>
>  115A(5e) requires *the court* to determine if the initial request for
> blocking is a proportional response. If you've already received the
> injunction papers to block the site, the court will have clearly made that
> determination already. You don't get to make that call. Same with 115A(5i)
> etc - if you've already got the injunction papers in your hand asking you
> to block the site, all those factors have already been evaluated by the
> court.
>


Correct me if I'm mistaken, but the CSP is a party to the granting of the
injunction, so you get to contest the reasonableness _before_ it's granted.
I have seen it reported otherwise in the media.

(I am not a lawyer. This is not expert opinion)

Paul Wilkins
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20150623/9d147c3c/attachment.html>