[AusNOG] IPv6
Russell Langton
russell3901 at gmail.com
Wed Apr 1 11:37:50 EST 2015
I think this discussion could continue for a while with everyone's
different opinions........
Lets start looking forward;
While on the subject on Ipv6 deployments, If you have not started a Ipv6
deployment for your network - I wonder if anyone can comment about whats
holding them back?
Is it upstream connectivity/legacy devices/lack of business
driver/time/training/testing etc.
Might be interesting to see what is the feedback from the industry.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Mark ZZZ Smith <markzzzsmith at yahoo.com.au>
wrote:
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Robert Hudson <hudrob at gmail.com>
> *To:* Mark Delany <g2x at juliet.emu.st>
> *Cc:* ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 1 April 2015, 10:20
> *Subject:* Re: [AusNOG] IPv6
>
>
> On 01/04/2015 9:20 AM, "Mark Delany" <g2x at juliet.emu.st> wrote:
> >
> > On 01Apr15, Mark Andrews allegedly wrote:
> > >
> > > In message <CAOu9xNJbkKhU3DbTjmX1LG5hcpx+uS-6XxOjajd3rS=
> wHEurFg at mail.gmail.com>, Robert Hudson writes:
> > > >
> > > > Right now, it seems that some ISPs/carriers are deciding to invest in
> > > > NAT/PAT (or CGN, if that's really a thing) rather than IPv6. Why?
> >
> > > No, its been selected because ISPs as a whole have procastinated
> > > about delivering IPv6
> >
> > Not sure it's an either/or situation. Even if you deploy IPv6
> > everywhere you still have to offer IPv4 reachability for your
> > customers.
> >
> > Hopefully what Robert is observing is not an alternative to IPv6,
> > rather it's a means of giving customers access to those recalcitrant
> > IPv4-only destinations.
> That was my point. Even if an ISP offers IPv6 to 100% of its customers, it
> still needs to offer IPv4 to practically 100% of its customers as well,
> because there's a lot of systems/software/tools out there that don't yet
> speak IPv6.
>
> / So nobody here who is advocating deploying IPv6 is saying (or has said)
> to switch off IPv4 at the same time.
>
>
>
>
> >
> > On the bright side, the more IPv6 you deploy the less traffic will
> > need to pass through your CGN. IOWs, deploying IPV6 could actually
> > save you some coin!
> >
> >
> > Mark.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AusNOG mailing list
> > AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> > http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20150401/2030c804/attachment.html>
More information about the AusNOG
mailing list