[AusNOG] Bgp capable router for aws direct connect

[Bill Walker]

Cameron is correct, it's one BGP session per VPC, if you want everything 
to be private. Otherwise you can setup peering between VPC's but the VPC 
peering traffic costs $$$$ so you will be paying twice for that traffic.


On 2014-10-07 23:24, Cameron Daniel wrote:
> On 2014-10-07 6:50 pm, Matthew VK3EVL wrote:
>> Keeping it simple. One side, aws, will only feed routes via bgp. It
>> will have 50 or so private ip /21s
>> Default route on the other interface going to the core that is more
>> than capable of gigabit but not licensed for bgp. Any filtering will
>> be done there or on a firewall.
> 
> Be aware that if those 50 or so prefixes will be from 50 or so VPCs
> then I think you'll need that many BGP sessions as well. This might
> also be a limit if you're looking at a switch to handle the routing.
> 
> If it's a public virtual interface for non-EC2 AWS services then 
> disregard
> 
> Cheers
> Cameron
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog