[AusNOG] Interesting

[Andrew Thrift]

I just attempted to fill out the requisite paperwork to become registered
with TICSA.

They want a list of every outsource contract and all customers traversing
shared network infrastructure, the dates your contracts with said customers
commenced and how many end users are contained within these customers.

Even for my employer, a small provider this is a lot of work, I would hate
to think how much work this would be for the larger ISP's.









On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Skeeve Stevens <
skeeve+ausnog at eintellegonetworks.com> wrote:

> Yeah, I would agree... I think it is for the providers of end connectivity
> to customers... I don't think the cloud providers would fall under it, but
> you never know.
>
>
> ...Skeeve
>
> *Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd
> skeeve at eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com
>
> Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
>
> facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ;  <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>
> linkedin.com/in/skeeve
>
> twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com
>
>
> The Experts Who The Experts Call
> Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering
>
>
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Lindsay Hill <lindsay.k.hill at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> "Well at the very least if there was even a remote chance of a Amazon /
>> Azure / GoogleCompute region opening up in NZ they just blew that chance
>> clear of the water."
>>
>> Why, given that this law is more targeting ISPs (i.e. not cloud
>> providers), and those firms comply with similar interception/tapping
>> regimes in other countries they operate in?
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Damian Guppy <the.damo at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Well at the very least if there was even a remote chance of a Amazon /
>>> Azure / GoogleCompute region opening up in NZ they just blew that chance
>>> clear of the water.
>>>
>>> --Damian
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Paul Gear <ausnog at libertysys.com.au>wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 05/13/2014 06:24 PM, Matt Palmer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> It's the law of the land, chaps, and the price of playing in a
>>>>> particular country.
>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I can't imagine NZ is significant enough in global terms that an
>>>> international company would think twice about leaving if the new laws made
>>>> their NZ operation commercially non-viable.  Does the GCSB think it will do
>>>> anything except drive international companies out of the NZ market?  Or
>>>> don't they care?  Curious to know what the grey heads here think...
>>>>
>>>> Paul
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> AusNOG mailing list
>>>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>>>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> AusNOG mailing list
>>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AusNOG mailing list
>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20140514/cd86a9ef/attachment.html>