[AusNOG] another ipv6 Q

[Damien Gardner Jnr]

I’m not so sure - I had a /22 allocated yesterday, and the v6 was allocated as a /48?  Though I really have no need for anything larger, so I have no inclination to go ask about a /32 :-p

—DG

On 3 Jul 2014, at 12:09 pm, Robert Hudson <hudrob at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 3 July 2014 11:48, Mark Andrews <marka at isc.org> wrote:
> 
> In message <CAEUfUGPOheJKFW8yNUJ_Y=wtOV978RaeXraMfLP82xQJXrB+0A at mail.gmail.com>, Skee
> ve Stevens writes:
> > --e89a8f8393fdab65e704fd3faae4
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> >
> > Mark,
> >
> > To be accurate, ipv6 from APNIC is not $0.
> 
> I said he could get IPv6 addresses for $0 based on the prerequiste
> that he had IPv4 addresses from them.  I did not say how many
> addresses he could get for $0 or that he could get unlimited IPv6
> addresses because I couldn't be bothered running the calculator.
> 
> > If your IPv6 allocation exceeds the value of the IPv4 allocation, you will
> > pay the greater of the two.
> 
> Which is why the next sentence was "You pay MAX(IPv4 cost, IPv6 cost)."
> 
>  If you have a /24 IPv4 allocation from APNIC, it is my understanding that you can get a /32 IPv6 allocation at no additional cost (and I believe it has infact already been allocated to you by default, you just need to claim it and start using it).
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20140703/c179a07d/attachment.html>