[AusNOG] another ipv6 Q

[Robert Hudson]

On 3 July 2014 11:48, Mark Andrews <marka at isc.org> wrote:

>
> In message <CAEUfUGPOheJKFW8yNUJ_Y=
> wtOV978RaeXraMfLP82xQJXrB+0A at mail.gmail.com>, Skee
> ve Stevens writes:
> > --e89a8f8393fdab65e704fd3faae4
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> >
> > Mark,
> >
> > To be accurate, ipv6 from APNIC is not $0.
>
> I said he could get IPv6 addresses for $0 based on the prerequiste
> that he had IPv4 addresses from them.  I did not say how many
> addresses he could get for $0 or that he could get unlimited IPv6
> addresses because I couldn't be bothered running the calculator.
>
> > If your IPv6 allocation exceeds the value of the IPv4 allocation, you
> will
> > pay the greater of the two.
>
> Which is why the next sentence was "You pay MAX(IPv4 cost, IPv6 cost)."


 If you have a /24 IPv4 allocation from APNIC, it is my understanding that
you can get a /32 IPv6 allocation at no additional cost (and I believe it
has infact already been allocated to you by default, you just need to claim
it and start using it).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20140703/18917702/attachment.html>