[AusNOG] GoodBye NBN
adamn at eyemedia.com.au
adamn at eyemedia.com.au
Mon Sep 9 11:54:43 EST 2013
What happens to those that live say 8km's+ FROM a proposed node, same
ADSL issues, hell I'm 4km's from my exchange and can't get over 1Mbps on
ADSL2+ due to copper "condition" yet (the usual store) my line won't get
looked at due to it no actually suffering drop outs, but I have to put up
with the SHIT speed? Kinda stiff luck, guess I'll have the same issues
with FTTN, Bad luck to anyone that what's a small lifestyle change and
lives on a semi rural property, again stiff luck, at least the FTTP had
the facility for a network extension, but what do you do with FTTN for an
network extension? Fund a whole node?
*sigh* looks like the next carrier/business that comes up with the first
"last kilometre" solution (microwave/wireless/whatever back to a town at
an affordable price) should/would make a bucket load.
At least there are some out there trying...
https://www.change.org/en-AU/petitions/the-liberal-party-of-australia-reconsider-your-plan-for-a-fttn-nbn-in-favour-of-a-superior-ftth-nbn
Regards
Adam
From: James Hodgkinson <yaleman at ricetek.net>
To: Paul Wallace <paul.wallace at mtgi.com.au>,
Cc: "AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net" <ausnog at lists.ausnog.net>
Date: 09/09/2013 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] GoodBye NBN
Sent by: "AusNOG" <ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net>
"People" really don't understand anything more than "that Turnbull guy
said it would be cheaper and faster"... even some of the guys in my team
agree with that viewpoint. :'(
James
On 9 September 2013 11:28, Paul Wallace <paul.wallace at mtgi.com.au> wrote:
Last Saturday the people of Australia voted the supporters of FTTH out on
& voted the supporters of FTTN in.
That tells us that more people don’t care about the problems to do with
the copper CAN than people who do care.
From: Jake Anderson [mailto:yahoo at vapourforge.com]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 11:20 AM
To: Paul Wallace
Cc: Chard, Alex (RET-SYD); Peter Betyounan; Noel Butler;
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] GoodBye NBN
It is a logical position.
You are trading one set of flaws for another, if that trade results in a
net gain then it is a "good thing".
The only flaw that has been identified with the FTTH *network* in this
discussion (not the applications such as voip running over said network)
is operation in a blackout lasting longer than 4 hours (or 8 hours if you
can get the person to press the emergency button).
This is a solvable problem, you can supply power at a location with any
level of reliability that you desire, Put some bigass batteries in and a
solar panel if you have to, hell put a mini diesel generator in as well if
you are really worried. However the number of people who would benefit
from this to my mind is small and shrinking.
The copper network also has major failures, what happens when it rains and
the lines get "crossed" to the point you can't dial out or understand a
call you are receiving, or they just crap out totally, this happens to my
father about once a year. Or when there is a flood in QLD and nothing
works till it dries out again.
The solution to this problem is to run new copper, which I feel given the
solvable nature of the FTTH systems issues and its benefits in operation
is a bad trade.
Now FTTN will take coppers problems and make them worse I feel, unless
they have waterproof nodes now?
On 09/09/13 10:59, Paul Wallace wrote:
I agree …
It’s not logical to suggest that we should replace the copper network
because it’s flawed to then suggest that it’s OK that the new network is
flawed.
-P
From: AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of Chard,
Alex (RET-SYD)
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 10:56 AM
To: Peter Betyounan; Noel Butler
Cc: AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] GoodBye NBN
I can’t agree with this argument. It’s nothing to do with planning for the
older generation.
The problems mentioned below are real problems. And they are not problems
that are insurmountable.
They are problems that should be addressed.
Nobody here is saying ‘stop the NBN rollout, old people can’t cope with
it’ (or at least I hope they are not).
They are pointing out problems that need looking at.
But your assertion below is not valid, because cars with all these fancy
new features that old people don’t have the skills to use still go when
you press the accelerator, and stop when you press the brake.
They have no broken features… and are ‘backwards compatible’ with old
people J
--Alex Chard
From: AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of Peter
Betyounan
Sent: Monday, 9 September 2013 10:45 AM
To: Noel Butler
Cc: AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] GoodBye NBN
Again planning for the older generation not the current or next, it's like
saying hey lets stop building more advance cars with parking assist, GPS,
reverse parking sensors, fancy alarms because the older generation don't
have the technical skills for them.
Regards,
Peter Betyounan
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net>
wrote:
On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 10:23 +1000, Robert Hudson wrote:
On 9 September 2013 10:15, Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net> wrote:
So, your landlines die after an hour of power outage now? find that hard
to believe... sniff sniff, yes, troll day appears to have come early this
week..
To be fair, many people with cordless phones (and there are lots) would
start having issues pretty quickly into a power outage. Sure, a corded
phone may still work, but many people don't have them.
thats there problem, you can buy cheap wired sets for 10 bucks from places
like Sams warehouse
and as for portable, how many old folk (70/80+) run around living on their
mobiles. SFA thats how many.
just because the average person and their inner circles here live on the
things, dont assume the rest of the population does as well.
and the elderly are the MOST and highest "at risk" from this change.
My 88yo grandmother has a mobile phone that she answers more regularly
than she answers her landline (which, FYI, has a cordless phone connected
to it). I'd suggest assumptions are bad no matter who's argument they're
supporting. :)
Maybe so, my dad who's approaching 80 also has one,mum does not, and does
not want one either, but none of his, or mum's friends do have one. I
would expect people related to technical people may, but don't go assuming
they all do, if I went up to the RSL on a packet out Saturday arvo and
held a vote I'd be betting maybe only 10/20 might have one.
_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
This e-mail is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and
then delete it. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use,
disclose or distribute this e-mail without the author's permission. We
have taken precautions to minimise the risk of transmitting software
viruses, but we advise you to carry out your own virus checks on any
attachment to this e-mail. We cannot accept liability for any loss or
damage caused by software viruses.
_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
". <- grain of salt. Take as needed with above advice. "
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20130909/7cc5571f/attachment.html>
More information about the AusNOG
mailing list