[AusNOG] NBN must avoid becoming 'failed state'

[Roland Chan]

I think that's Roland's point: more of the same isn't that good.

On 18 Sep 2010 12:06, "Mark Smith" <
nanog at 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:53:01 +1000
> Andrew Oskam <percy at th3interw3bs.net> wrote:
>
>>
http://www.itnews.com.au/News/232471,nbn-must-avoid-becoming-failed-state.aspx?eid=3&edate=20100917&utm_source=20100917_PM&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=daily_newsletter&eaddr=blue.flayme@gmail.com
>>
>> Just seen this pop up. Was a very interesting read and I agree with
Roland on the matter.
>>
>>
>
> Why are people seeming to pretend the NBN is something new and
> radical and that it creates a whole new set of issues? Isn't it just
> more of the same?
>
>> Andrew Oskam
>> E percy at th3interw3bs.net
>>
>> NOTICE:
>> These comments are my own personal opinions only and do not necessarily
reflect the positions or opinions of my employer or their affiliates. All
comments are based upon my current knowledge and my own personal
experiences. You should conduct independent tests to verify the validity of
any statements made in this email before basing any decisions upon those
statements.
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20100918/48031fc3/attachment.html>