[AusNOG] SMH: "No room at the internet"

Wed May 19 12:51:44 EST 2010

I totally agree, there needs to be much more publicity regarding this.

NTT has been offering commercial dual stack and native IPv6 globally since
2003 on our Global IP Network (GIN), including Australia.

There are some ISPs and network providers with NTT as their upstream
utilising the dual stack and native v6 connectivity and some looking at
trialling.

It's time that ISPs start looking at this seriously if they haven't yet.

Regards

Ankur Puri

NTT Australia Pty Ltd

P: +61 2 8915 8948 | F: +61 2 9251 5749 | M: +61 433 114 275

W: www.au.ntt.com | Global IP Network (GIN): www.ntt.net
<http://www.ntt.net/english> 

  _____  

From: ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net
[mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of Aaron Weller //
Crucial Paradigm
Sent: Wednesday, 19 May 2010 11:37 AM
To: Andrew Oskam
Cc: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] SMH: "No room at the internet"

I agree, while the article may not be 100% correct - something like this is
needed to bring around awareness for people not in the industry.  The more
publicity, the better!

Andrew Oskam wrote: 

Going back on topic...

I think it's a great thing that the article was published as there are still
plenty of people NOT in the industry who don't even know that this change is
coming.

It's certainly forseeable that I will be receiving calls in the close future
from customers who will be skewing their faces when I start to read out an
IPv6 address to them.

People need to be made aware and educated on the change because this is
something that will affect everyone...big and small.

+10 internets to the publisher for an excellent article.

The whole debate on the correct grammer for 'internet' is a bit pointless
really..at the end of the day.

..Andrew :)

On 19/05/10 11:03 AM, Skeeve Stevens wrote: 

Hey all,

I find it amusing that people like Daniel here are talking about IPv6 as
though there is still a time to have an opinion on whether IPv6 is a good
thing.

As was the feeling at APNIC 29 in KL as well as the theme of the 2010 IPv6
Summit "You're Standing in it" - IPv6 is HERE... it isn't coming, it isn't a
choice, it works now... do it or not be in business in a couple of years
(for carriers, ISPs, etc).

IPv6 is no longer in the testing phases - it is real... and if you are an
ISP and you aren't thinking about it right now... in a year you are going to
be screwed.

It is going to take a good year for the ISP's to spread IPv6 knowledge
throughout an organisation - Level 1 helpdesk, Sales, and indeed management
who may have to budget something to implement it properly.

OK, so have an opinion on whether IPv6 is a good thing... but your opinion
doesn't matter in the end... You need to do it at some point, or else.

...Skeeve

--

Skeeve Stevens, CEO/Technical Director

eintellego Pty Ltd - The Networking Specialists

skeeve at eintellego.net / www.eintellego.net

Phone: 1300 753 383, Fax: (+612) 8572 9954

Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 / skype://skeeve

www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve ; facebook.com/eintellego

--

NOC, NOC, who's there?

From: ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net
[mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of Daniel Hood
Sent: Wednesday, 19 May 2010 10:17 AM
To: Bevan Slattery
Cc: ausnog at ausnog.net
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] SMH: "No room at the internet"

Them "Internets" ain't going to die if we all start using capital I's. It is
however going to be come extremely address exhausted.

What is the general opinion of people here on IPv6? In my opinion, I welcome
the move, because for one it means that these nounce kids (such as myself)
are going to have a lot more trouble "faking it" when they attempt to get
jobs well above there skill level running networks they shouldn't be allowed
near. I mean if you can't convert to hex you can't really use IPv6 all that
well. And that means these kids with their Pass4Sure CCNA's and no real
world experience won't be able to hide underneath the radar of the
192.168.0.x subnet anymore. 

I also like the fact that instead of having to sparingly use my 8 home IPs
for a honeynet, test servers and production servers I can be a bit more
giving. 

And last but not least, that feature that allows the host to discover
default gateways looks pretty bad ass, I really want to have a good play
with that as well. 

Everyone else's thoughts?

Dan

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Bevan Slattery
<Bevan.Slattery at staff.pipenetworks.com> wrote:

Actually.  I did jump off half-cocked.  After reading the article
(rather than just your post) she was perhaps intending it to be a proper
noun (like a hotel name), so I'll take one for the team here.  However,
if it wasn't used in the manner intended, then the rest would be fine.
Sorry Scott.

Ordinarily it's a pet peeve of mine when people correct me for not using
capital "i".  At least I got to inject a clip of a couple of great shows
being The IT Crowd or South Park :)

Cheers

[b]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bevan Slattery
> Sent: Wednesday, 19 May 2010 9:56 AM
> To: Scott Howard; ausnog at ausnog.net
> Subject: RE: [AusNOG] SMH: "No room at the internet"
>
>
>
> > All up, it's enough to make you cringe (starting with the lack of a
> > capital I in the subject, it goes downhill from there), but
> there are
> > some good quotes from Geoff Huston...
>

> Sheesh.  The thing that makes me cringe a bit is people who
> still insist that internet should start with a capital "I".
> As the Wikipedia entry found here
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_capitalization_conventio

> ns acknowledges

>
> "Critics of the usage as a proper noun argue that other
> things that are unique yet distributed, such as "the power
> grid", "the telephone network", and even "the sky", are not
> considered proper nouns, and are thus not capitalized. Since
> at least 2002 it has been theorized that Internet has been
> changing from a proper noun to a generic term.[4] Words for
> new technologies, such as Phonograph in the 19th century, are
> sometimes capitalized at first, later becoming
> uncapitalized.[4] It was suggested as early as 1999 that
> Internet might, like some other commonly used proper nouns,
> lose its capital letter."
>
> You will note that the SMH along with the Economist,
> Financial Times and the Guardian also use the non-capitalised version.
>
> IMHO to raise the 'internet' as proper noun fails to
> acknowledge the work and investment by this exact industry to
> make it generic or ubiquitous.  For me the same applies to
> [E]ethernet.  If you want to use capitals, then go ahead.  If
> you don't, don't.  But don't pick people up for using lower
> case "i", because you'll be in the the same category as Jen
> from the IT Crowd http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTBsm0LzSP0
> or those who doubted Kyle on South Park
> http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/166192 :)
>
> Cheers
>
> [b]
_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog

_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog

  _____  

_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20100519/9870b753/attachment.html>