[AusNOG] Urgent - Pacnet NOC contact (with BGP clue)

[Thomas Nisbet-Smith]

My simplistic view was that perhaps Skeeve could advertise "more specific"
routes
that would then be preferred over the routes being advertised by
the culprits, i.e. if they are advertising /24s
then change your statements to advertise 2x /25s

Not sure if that would work but we used to use that for dual links to ensure
or traffic
always flowed in a certain direction.

Cheers
Tom

On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 6:25 AM, Don Gould <don at bowenvale.co.nz> wrote:

>
>
> On 11/12/2010 12:32 a.m., Skeeve Stevens wrote:
>
> What do Pacnets up streams have to say?  At present I can't get to the
> network as it's not routing past 21  gi1-0-4.gw1.syd3.asianetcom.net
> (202.147.14.154) from both .nz and .us
>
> RFI - Not all of us really understand bgp, so sorry if the following
> seems like an idiot question, but can providers all just announce the
> correct info to drown out the wrong information? (and yes I do
> understand how dumb that sounds as well, it's like 2 wrongs trying to
> make a right).
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20101211/cf2fb7f1/attachment.html>