[AusNOG] Web filter a runaway success: Exetel
McDonald Richards
macca at vocus.com.au
Wed May 6 10:45:08 EST 2009
You'll have to pay Google a licensing fee if you want to build a floating DC
now :)
http://arstechnica.com/hardware/news/2009/05/floating-data-center-patent-gra
nted-to-google.ars
Macca
From: ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net
[mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of Colwell, Scott
Sent: Wednesday, 6 May 2009 10:24 AM
To: ausnog at ausnog.net
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Web filter a runaway success: Exetel
Just been to see "The Boat that Rocked".
Can I interest anyone in setting up a web hosting business on a ship outside
the
territorial limits? Moor it over PPC-1 and get Bev to hook you up!
Scott
_____
From: ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net
[mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of Matthew Moyle-Croft
Sent: Tuesday, 5 May 2009 9:38 PM
To: ausnog at ausnog.net
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Web filter a runaway success: Exetel
And just so no one thinks this is a good idea:
http://www.efa.org.au/2009/05/05/efa-gets-link-removal-notice/
Insane and angry making.
MMC
Mark Newton wrote:
On 05/05/2009, at 6:51 PM, Kai wrote:
Mmmm, so the article doesn't tell the full story, figures, but what's
the bet that certain people in certain places will use this one
article
to basically say "Hey, see, the filter aint ALL bad..." :S
The problem is that Peter Mancer from Watchdog has already admitted that
it can't satisfy even the most watered-down of the Government's
requirements,
because it can't cope with URLs hosted on high-traffic sites occupying
the blacklist.
Remember: Since last year, Conroy has claimed that he wants the ACMA
prohibited list to be blocked. When the ACMA prohibited list was leaked
that position became politically hilarious, so he changed his tune to
"almost exclusively RC" (SBS Insight 31 March 2009), then "We've
never stated that we were going to do anything other than Refused
Classification" (Triple J Hack, 7 April 2009)
http://newmatilda.com/polliegraph/?p=567
The problem is that the Classification Board has Refused Classification
to several YouTube videos, which means the ultimate "high traffic site"
is on the blacklist even after Conroy has changed all the definitions.
And Mancer has said that high-traffic sites will blow his system's
brains
out. Indeed, the failure mode is exactly the same (and for exactly the
same reason) as the IWF Wikipedia failure in the UK in early December.
Mancer's proposed solution is to whitelist high-traffic sites, so they
won't
be blocked even if the Government insists that they must be.
So Exetel has had a "runaway success" in testing a system which cannot
satisfy the Government's requirements.
Can Exetel deploy Mancer's censorbox without a Government mandate to
deploy a voluntary filtering service in response to demand from their
customers? By all means, and more power to them. Hope it works out
for them.
But will that meet the dictates of the Government's stated policy?
Nope. They'll need another, untested censorbox to do that.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: newton at internode.com.au
(W)
Network Engineer Email:
newton at atdot.dotat.org (H)
Internode Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8-82282999
"Network Man" - Anagram of "Mark Newton" Mobile: +61-416-202-223
_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
**********************************************************************
_____________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by MCI's Internet Managed
Scanning Services - powered by MessageLabs. For further information
visit http://www.mci.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20090506/0df270f4/attachment.html>
More information about the AusNOG
mailing list