[AusNOG] Reply to list or sender ?

[Andy Linton]

On 8/08/2009, at 24:09 , David Hughes wrote:

>
> You know, the number of complaints I get about the "reply to list"
> setup is amazing.  I also think it's not ideal.  I'd be happier with
> the list setup with reply to sender (as is nanog, c-nsp, ietf etc etc
> etc).   Thoughts?

The nznog and pacnog lists cope perfectly well with 'reply to sender'  
- I'm kind of surpised to see this as the setup on this list.

New kid on the block,
andy