[AusNOG] Outsourcing Green Power

[Ben Buxton]

Google's peering policy is quite open so think most, if not all, peers
on the fabric are eligible to establish a bilateral session.

Ben 

Nick Brown wrote:
> I was under the assumption that Google were not going to support 
> multilateral peering, so assumed that when I saw the updated list with 
> the addition of Google yet had no routes, they were just using the 
> fabric for bilateral peers. If this is the case, to be honest its a 
> little annoying that we pay for peering on the basis that peers such as 
> Google are on the list - yet then we don't even have access to them...
> 
> Nick.
> 
> Bill Woodcock wrote:
> >
> > On Oct 3, 2008, at 7:56 PM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
> >> Any chance you can fill us in on the Google peering on Pipe/Equinix in
> >> Sydney since your name seems to be all over it.
> >
> > Okay, you guys know that if there were anything I could say, I would.
> >
> > If you want information about Google peering, Maurice Dean's your 
> > man.  mdean at google.com.
> >
> > If, on the other hand, your interest were less in information and more 
> > in getting a route in your routing table that you might not have right 
> > now, you might open a ticket with peering at pch.net to turn up sessions 
> > with AS42 and AS3856.
> >
> >                                 -Bill
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AusNOG mailing list
> > AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> > http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
> >   
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog

-- 
Ben Buxton - Random Network Person