[AusNOG] Outsourcing Green Power

[Nick Brown]

Well, I stand corrected then :-)

I was basing my comments on Vijay's talk at the conference.

Ben Buxton wrote:
>
> Google's peering policy is quite open so think most, if not all, peers 
> on the fabric are eligible to establish a bilateral session.
>
> Ben
>
> Nick Brown wrote:
>> I was under the assumption that Google were not going to support 
>> multilateral peering, so assumed that when I saw the updated list 
>> with the addition of Google yet had no routes, they were just using 
>> the fabric for bilateral peers. If this is the case, to be honest its 
>> a little annoying that we pay for peering on the basis that peers 
>> such as Google are on the list - yet then we don't even have access 
>> to them...
>>
>> Nick.
>>
>> Bill Woodcock wrote:
>>> On Oct 3, 2008, at 7:56 PM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
>>>> Any chance you can fill us in on the Google peering on Pipe/Equinix in
>>>> Sydney since your name seems to be all over it.
>>> Okay, you guys know that if there were anything I could say, I would.
>>>
>>> If you want information about Google peering, Maurice Dean's your 
>>> man.  mdean at google.com.
>>>
>>> If, on the other hand, your interest were less in information and 
>>> more in getting a route in your routing table that you might not 
>>> have right now, you might open a ticket with peering at pch.net to turn 
>>> up sessions with AS42 and AS3856.
>>>
>>>                                 -Bill
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> AusNOG mailing list
>>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>>   
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AusNOG mailing list
>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>