[AusNOG] Outsourcing Green Power

[Nick Brown]

I was under the assumption that Google were not going to support 
multilateral peering, so assumed that when I saw the updated list with 
the addition of Google yet had no routes, they were just using the 
fabric for bilateral peers. If this is the case, to be honest its a 
little annoying that we pay for peering on the basis that peers such as 
Google are on the list - yet then we don't even have access to them...

Nick.

Bill Woodcock wrote:
>
> On Oct 3, 2008, at 7:56 PM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
>> Any chance you can fill us in on the Google peering on Pipe/Equinix in
>> Sydney since your name seems to be all over it.
>
> Okay, you guys know that if there were anything I could say, I would.
>
> If you want information about Google peering, Maurice Dean's your 
> man.  mdean at google.com.
>
> If, on the other hand, your interest were less in information and more 
> in getting a route in your routing table that you might not have right 
> now, you might open a ticket with peering at pch.net to turn up sessions 
> with AS42 and AS3856.
>
>                                 -Bill
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>