[AusNOG] Software Defined Routers

[Paul Wilkins]

>> "if performance matters (and it does very much so), why would you be
using *_anything_* virtualised at all..."

Because it's not actually possible to write meaningful SLAs for time
multiplexed services.

At the end of the day I agree with Brad, if you need a performant system
you want resident hardware.

Kind regards

Paul Wilkins

On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 21:20, Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net> wrote:

> if performance matters (and it does very much so), why would you be using
> *_anything_* virtualised at all...
>
>
> On 03/10/2019 23:19, Guy Ellis wrote:
>
> Has anyone bothered to evaluate TNSR which I will think replace pfsense
> where performance really matters?
>
> --
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Noel Butler
> This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally privileged
> information, therefore remains confidential and subject to copyright
> protected under international law. You may not disseminate, discuss, or
> reveal, any part, to anyone, without the authors express written authority
> to do so. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
> then delete all copies of this message including attachments, immediately.
> Confidentiality, copyright, and legal privilege are not waived or lost by
> reason of the mistaken delivery of this message. Only PDF
> <http://www.adobe.com/> and ODF
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDocument> documents accepted, please do
> not send proprietary formatted documents
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20191005/4ed6ffc9/attachment.html>