[AusNOG] Copyright Amendment Bill 2018

[Paul Wilkins]

(2B) Without limiting subsection(2A), the injunction may:

(a) require the carriage service provider to take reasonable steps to do
either or both of the following:

(i) block domain names, URLs and IP addresses that provide access to the
online location and that are specified in the injunction;

(ii) block domain names, URLs and IP addresses that the carriage service
provider and the owner of the copyright agree, in writing, have started to
provide access to the online location after the injunction is made; and

(b) require the online search engine provider to take reasonable steps to
do either or both of the following:

(i) not provide search results that include domain names, URLs and IP
addresses that provide access to the online location and that are specified
in the injunction;

(ii) not provide search results that includ e domain names, URLs and IP
addresses that the online search engine provider and the owner of the
copyright agree, in writing, have started to provide access to the online
location after the injunction is made.

https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/bills/r6209_first-reps/toc_pdf/18217b01.pdf;fileType=application%2Fpdf

On Thu, 18 Oct 2018 at 16:54, Saxton, Joseph (SYD-FED) <
Joseph.Saxton at interpublic.com> wrote:

> Saw this as well on itnews.
> https://www.itnews.com.au/news/govt-to-beef-up-website-blocking-laws-514111
>
>
>
> Looks like it brings powers to force search engines to remove search
> results
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *AusNOG <ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net> on behalf of Robert
> Hudson <hudrob at gmail.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, 18 October 2018 at 4:46 pm
> *To: *Mark Currie <MCurrie at laserfast.com.au>
> *Cc: *"ausnog at ausnog.net" <ausnog at ausnog.net>
> *Subject: *[EXTERNAL] Re: [AusNOG] Copyright Amendment Bill 2018
>
>
>
> Which govt department is introducing it?
>
>
>
> Not that it really matters - I haven't seen an ability to competently
> computer from any federal government department for years now...
>
>
>
> On Thu, 18 Oct. 2018, 4:30 pm Mark Currie, <MCurrie at laserfast.com.au>
> wrote:
>
> From an industry mag…
>
>
>
> A bill to be introduced to parliament today - the Copyright Amendment
> (Online Infringement) Bill 2018 - will attempt to strengthen what the
> government called its “existing, successful website blocking scheme
> introduced ... in 2015”.
>
>
>
> So the bit about… “existing, successful website blocking scheme introduced
> ... in 2015"
>
>
>
> Do they mean the one which can be bypassed by a knowledgeable 10yo?
>
>
>
> ROFL
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.ausnog.net_mailman_listinfo_ausnog&d=DwMFaQ&c=Ftw_YSVcGmqQBvrGwAZugGylNRkk-uER0-5bY94tjsc&r=srheiojgNn4Jg0keeQ9hj6cyp8zgHx0m-eTRLdD3nnw&m=CE73ATbFnQoFJSWJX2cLxM8CnaLjKbtWNjC5MileXUc&s=UjP1Q0wBTVZ5vTHtng256XA7zAaR_vemEkVSjipeGWI&e=>
>
> This message contains information which may be confidential and
> privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient (or authorized to receive
> this message for the intended recipient), you may not use, copy,
> disseminate or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained
> in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise
> the sender by reply e-mail, and delete the message. Thank you very much.
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20181019/34bcb84a/attachment.html>