[AusNOG] HE Routing (not a joke)

[Scott Howard]

Based on a traceroute from my Comcast connection in the San Jose area, it's
definitely located in Sydney.

Looks to me like the path back from HE to you is going via the US.

10ge5-10.core1.sjc2.he.net                     0.0%    14   15.9  16.4
15.6  20.4   1.1
 9. 10ge4-4.core1.sjc1.he.net                      0.0%    14   15.7  21.4
15.6  45.6   9.5
10. 10ge2-1.core1.syd1.he.net                      0.0%    14  163.9 164.6
161.5 177.7   4.9
11. tserv1.syd1.he.net                             0.0%    14  161.7 162.3
161.3 166.1   1.4


  Scott



On Tue, May 15, 2018, 12:07 Christopher Hawker <me at chrishawker.com.au>
wrote:

> Hi All,
>
>
> I've seen that HE now supposedly run a IPv6 Tunnel Server in Sydney,
> although I have doubts as to it's location after a few traceroutes. This is
> from SY4 via NSW-IX:
>
>
> default.master at cr1:~$ traceroute 216.218.142.50
> traceroute to 216.218.142.50 (216.218.142.50), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
>  1  upstream.carrier (192.0.2.254)  0.183 ms  0.123 ms  0.108 ms
>  2  as6939.nsw.ix.asn.au (218.100.52.249)  150.979 ms  152.368 ms
> 150.857 ms
>  3  tserv1.syd1.he.net (216.218.142.50)  150.751 ms  150.839 ms  150.755
> ms
>
> However, this trace is from an AAPT NBN HFC service:
>
>
> C:\Users\default.master>tracert 216.218.142.50
> Tracing route to tserv1.syd1.he.net [216.218.142.50]
> over a maximum of 30 hops:
>   1     2 ms     1 ms     1 ms  172.16.10.254
>   2     *        *        *     Request timed out.
>   3    12 ms    10 ms     9 ms  po41.sglebbrdr11.aapt.net.au
> [202.10.14.198]
>   4     8 ms     9 ms     9 ms  syd-gls-har-wgw1-be-30.tpgi.com.au
> [203.219.107.197]
>   5    10 ms    15 ms    14 ms  203.29.134-67.tpgi.com.au [203.29.134.67]
>   6   173 ms   170 ms   162 ms  100ge13-1.core1.sjc1.he.net
> [216.218.139.233]
>   7   308 ms   311 ms   308 ms  10ge2-1.core1.syd1.he.net [184.105.222.86]
>   8   309 ms   309 ms   309 ms  tserv1.syd1.he.net [216.218.142.50]
> Trace complete.
>
> The first trace looks like it is going over to the US (based on the
> latency), however the second looks like it is going to the US and
> back. Anyone else seen anything like this? If there are any HE techs on
> list, I'd appreciate it if they could please contact me off-list.
>
>
> CH.
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20180515/82ff5b64/attachment.html>