[AusNOG] [AUSNOG] MS patches Intel memory management

Scott Howard scott at doc.net.au
Sun Jan 14 12:12:58 EST 2018


Why would they do that when in most cases the impact will be a few percent?

Should they also increase prices if they release new ucode that makes
things faster (which they do, on occasion)

  Scott



On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 4:44 PM, Paul Wilkins <paulwilkins369 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Well the problem's fixable, so caveat emptor due diligence etc. the
> consumer now knows they're buying a flawed CPU. The question is whether
> Intel should drop their price point 30% to account for the diminished CPU.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Paul Wilkins
>
> On 14 January 2018 at 11:20, Michelle Sullivan <michelle at sorbs.net> wrote:
>
>> Paul Wilkins wrote:
>>
>>> Latest advice from Intel:
>>>
>>> https://security-center.intel.com/advisory.aspx?intelid=INTE
>>> L-SA-00088&languageid=en-fr
>>>
>>> No mention of warranty :)
>>>
>>> News to me, defect applies also in AMD and ARM.
>>>
>>> Very interested to hear if anyone takes this to Dep't Fair Trading and
>>> the response.
>>>
>>>
>> What will be as interesting is the word on why they are still selling
>> flawed processors.... especially as they have indicated there is no way to
>> fix it with an update.  Can you imagine selling a car that doesn't actually
>> have working brakes and then saying, "not our problem it's working as
>> designed"...
>>
>> Michelle
>>
>> Kind regards
>>>
>>> Paul Wilkins
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8 January 2018 at 11:50, James Hodgkinson <yaleman at ricetek.net
>>> <mailto:yaleman at ricetek.net>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Yep, we have security appliances sold on performance figures
>>>     that’ll be checked and pointed at pretty firmly post patching.
>>>
>>>
>>>     On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, at 09:57, Mark Newton wrote:
>>>
>>>>     The phrase, “Of merchantable quality and fitness for purpose,”
>>>>     will become increasingly familiar to vendors over the next few
>>>> weeks.
>>>>
>>>>     Note that if you have relied on performance statements from a
>>>>     server vendor, and that performance can’t be delivered because
>>>>     the CPU can’t operate as advertised, both the CPU vendor /and the
>>>>     server vendor/ have an obligation to make good.
>>>>
>>>>     Start on page 5:
>>>>     https://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/Warranties%20and%20refu
>>>> nds%20-%20a%20guide%20for%20consumers%20and%20business.pdf
>>>>     <https://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/Warranties%20and%20ref
>>>> unds%20-%20a%20guide%20for%20consumers%20and%20business.pdf>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        - mark
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     On Jan 5, 2018, at 1:18 AM, Giles Pollock <glp71s at gmail.com
>>>>     <mailto:glp71s at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     From their warranty section:
>>>>>
>>>>>     WHAT THIS LIMITED WARRANTY DOES NOT COVER:
>>>>>     • design defects or errors in the Product (Errata). Contact
>>>>>     Intel for information on characterized errata.
>>>>>     • any costs associated with the repair or replacement of the
>>>>>     Product, including costs of removal or replacement of the Product;
>>>>>     • damage to the Product, or errors or malfunctions in the
>>>>>     Product, due to accident, abnormal electrical, mechanical or
>>>>>     environmental conditions, use contrary to product instructions,
>>>>>     misuse, neglect, alteration, mishandling, repair, improper
>>>>>     installation or testing, combinations with incompatible products
>>>>>     or any third party virus, infection, worm or similar malicious
>>>>>     code;
>>>>>     • that the Product will protect against all possible security
>>>>>     threats, including intentional misconduct by third parties;
>>>>>     • any Product which has been modified or operated outside of
>>>>>     Intel’s publicly available specifications, including where clock
>>>>>     frequencies or voltages have been altered, or where the original
>>>>>     identification markings have been removed, altered or
>>>>>     obliterated. Intel assumes no responsibility that the Product,
>>>>>     including if used with altered clock frequencies or voltages,
>>>>>     will be fit for any particular purpose and will not cause any
>>>>>     damage or injury.
>>>>>
>>>>>     Option 1 and 4 seems to have them covered :-(
>>>>>
>>>>>     On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 1:07 AM, James Hodgkinson
>>>>>     <yaleman at ricetek.net <mailto:yaleman at ricetek.net>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>         Watch them pull out the “this warranty doesn’t actually
>>>>>         cover anything, and we don’t say it’ll work in all
>>>>>         conditions” card. It’ll be nice to get a free CPU if they do
>>>>>         have to, however! :)
>>>>>
>>>>>         On Thu, 4 Jan 2018, at 18:32, Damien Gardner Jnr wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>         If the hardware is under warranty, I'd be expecting the
>>>>>>         vendor to replace the CPU's with updated ones which are not
>>>>>>         affected? (oh man that's going to hurt Intel?)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         On 4 January 2018 at 16:31, Burt Mascareigne
>>>>>>         <Burt at stormnetwork.com.au
>>>>>>         <mailto:Burt at stormnetwork.com.au>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             So, with this performance hit, does that mean we have
>>>>>>             to buy more Intel Servers to cope O_o
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             *Burt Mascareigne
>>>>>>             Mobile* 0414 450 962 *Office* (02) 9965 5422
>>>>>>             *Address* Level 19, 1 O’Connell Street, Sydney NSW 2000
>>>>>>             *Web* http://www.stormnetwork.com.au
>>>>>>             <http://www.stormnetwork.com.au/> <image002.png>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             *From:*AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net
>>>>>>             <mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net>] *On Behalf Of
>>>>>>             *Paul Wilkins
>>>>>>             *Sent:* Thursday, 4 January 2018 3:52 PM
>>>>>>             *To:* ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
>>>>>>             <mailto:ausnog at lists.ausnog.net>
>>>>>>             *Subject:* [AusNOG] [AUSNOG] MS patches Intel memory
>>>>>>             management
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             Fix for security bug in Intel CPUs will be released
>>>>>>             patch Tuesday, and predictions are of a 5 - 30%
>>>>>>             performance hit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             This is a problem in cloud, but I'm sure it will all be
>>>>>>             good on the day :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             Kind regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             Paul Wilkins
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             _______________________________________________
>>>>>>             AusNOG mailing list
>>>>>>             AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
>>>>>>             http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>>>>>             <http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         --
>>>>>>         Damien Gardner Jnr
>>>>>>         VK2TDG. Dip EE. GradIEAust
>>>>>>         rendrag at rendrag.net <mailto:rendrag at rendrag.net> -
>>>>>>         http://www.rendrag.net/_
>>>>>>         _--
>>>>>>         We rode on the winds of the rising storm,
>>>>>>          We ran to the sounds of thunder.
>>>>>>         We danced among the lightning bolts,
>>>>>>          and tore the world asunder
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         _________________________________________________
>>>>>>         AusNOG mailing list
>>>>>>         AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
>>>>>>         http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>>>>>         <http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>>>         AusNOG mailing list
>>>>>         AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
>>>>>         http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>>>>         <http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>>     AusNOG mailing list
>>>>>     AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
>>>>>     http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>>>>     <http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     _________________________________________________
>>>>     AusNOG mailing list
>>>>     AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
>>>>     http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>>>     <http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     AusNOG mailing list
>>>     AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
>>>     http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>>     <http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> AusNOG mailing list
>>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AusNOG mailing list
>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20180113/27a3f2c8/attachment.html>


More information about the AusNOG mailing list