[AusNOG] Dutton decryption bill
Chad Kelly
chad at cpkws.com.au
Sat Aug 18 21:36:14 EST 2018
Facebook do have their own network globally and they also have Facebook
Messenger, and a lot of the service is encrypted so this bill would very
much apply to them.
It isn't just a website they have an entire platform ware Apps for both
mobile and desktop can be created and the network side of it as well,
they have an extensive network.
I think the issue with these bills is they are so dam vague and the
government don't have a great record when it comes to anything IT related.
On 8/18/2018 4:57 PM, Robert Hudson wrote:
> This bill has nothing to do with content on Facebook (or websites run
> by content creators, or even websites at all).
>
> The Internet is nothing like broadcast mediums such as radio and
> television, and cannot be regulated in the same way.
>
> This bill should never pass.
>
>
> On Sat, 18 Aug. 2018, 4:51 pm Chad Kelly, <chad at cpkws.com.au
> <mailto:chad at cpkws.com.au>> wrote:
>
> On 8/18/2018 12:00 PM, ausnog-request at lists.ausnog.net
> <mailto:ausnog-request at lists.ausnog.net> wrote:
>
> > Possible scenario:
> >
> > 3:00am Sunday morning, phone rings at the DC reception, is
> picked up by
> > security. "Hi, we've never met. This is Paul Symon of ASIS. I'm
> sending
> > some uniformed AFP officers over to sieze a number of servers.
> This call
> > constitutes a verbal technical assistance notice, and non compliance
> > carries a penalty of 5 years imprisonment".
> Given how most Datacentres work in this country I doubt this would
> happen.
> You generally need to be escorted by security into the areas ware
> equipment is housed and generally requests need to be made in writing
> and an appointment needs to be booked.
> You can't just walk in off the street, and you also need photo ID
> which
> gets scanned and stored for a period of at least 12 months, when
> you enter.
> You can't even just walk into the DC as a customer, hell for some of
> them you even need an induction before you can set foot in them.
> If someone did try this the operator would just demand something in
> writing and hang up the phone.
> Also security don't take phone calls that would be the on call
> techs job.
> The UK 10 or 12 years ago doesn't really apply to Au law and it was
> Verizon, who are a US company and they are now a lot larger then they
> were 11 years ago and Publicly listed.
> So I would suspect security at their facilities would be improved
> and a
> lot of those providers are getting out of the DC space and partnering
> with the likes of AWS anyway so they don't need to take
> responsibility
> for hardware.
>
> This bill has come about because of Facebook and them allowing
> video of
> child abuse to remain on the platform.
> If Facebook had been proactive and handed over the content to the AFP
> and the FBI as well as all of the users details none of this would
> even
> be being discussed.
> The Internet needs regulation just like Radio and Television.
> This bill should of been passed 20 years ago in reality.
>
> Regards Chad.
>
> --
> Chad Kelly
> Manager
> CPK Web Services
> Phone 03 5273 0246
> Web www.cpkws.com.au <http://www.cpkws.com.au>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
--
Chad Kelly
Manager
CPK Web Services
Phone 03 5273 0246
Web www.cpkws.com.au
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20180818/18fc7b11/attachment.html>
More information about the AusNOG
mailing list