[AusNOG] Au > South Africa Customer Link

[Mark Newton]

“It sounds like `Low latency’ isn’t as important to you as you initially led me to believe…” :-)

  - mark


> On Dec 18, 2017, at 4:22 PM, Cameron Murray <cameron.murray at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> That was a question I posed however the response was 70 application users here vs 600 there.
> 
> On 18 Dec. 2017 3:19 pm, "Mark Newton" <newton at atdot.dotat.org <mailto:newton at atdot.dotat.org>> wrote:
> Have they considered relocating the application?
> 
> I don’t think you’ll find a low latency path between those two countries, so if the application is latency-sensitive it’s always going to suck.
> 
> But you might find two best-available paths between each country and a workable midpoint which could lower your application latency by something approaching a factor of 2.
> 
>   - mark
> 
> 
> > On Dec 18, 2017, at 3:14 PM, Cameron Murray <cameron.murray at gmail.com <mailto:cameron.murray at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Guys,
> >
> > I've been asked to entertain the idea of a customer of ours needing a dedicated link between their Australian branches and their head office in ZA.
> >
> > They use a Latency sensitive application which is what they are trying to improve by this request. Is there any providers that office links from WA > ZA ? Currently latency ranges between 450 - 550ms from their WAN gateway in Brisbane however if there was an option to terminate a link to their Perth office we would take that path.
> >
> > TIA
> >
> > Cameron
> > _______________________________________________
> > AusNOG mailing list
> > AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
> > http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog <http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog>
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20171218/7bc246da/attachment.html>