[AusNOG] Best roundtrip latency to Israel?

[Clay Quinn]

Thanks – so 350ms probably about as good as we can get (thanks to others who replied directy).  Accordingly to TCP calculator, still going to be really slow with this latency.  WAN acceleration might be the only option (unless any other creative solutions we haven’t considered).


Cheers
Clay

Clay Quinn - MRV Australia
+61.427.339.000
cquinn at mrv.com

From: Aftab Siddiqui [mailto:aftab at eintellegonetworks.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 13 September 2016 11:01 AM
To: Clay Quinn <cquinn at mrv.com>
Cc: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Best roundtrip latency to Israel?

LG should be your friend...

Try Vocus http://tools.vocus.com.au/lg/
and
NTT Australia https://www.us.ntt.net/support/looking-glass/

One destination IP from Smile Telecom showing ~350ms delay.

Best Wishes,
Aftab Siddiqui - CTO & Country Manager
eintellego Networks Pty Ltd
Email: aftab at eintellegonetworks.com<mailto:aftab at eintellegonetworks.com> ; Web: eintellegonetworks.com<http://eintellegonetworks.com/>

Phone: 1300 239 038 ; Cell +61 (0)450 609 592 ; Skype: aftabsiddiqui2

Facebook: eintellegonetworks<http://facebook.com/eintellegonetworks> ; Twitter: eintellego<https://twitter.com/eintellego>

LinkedIn: /in/aftabs<http://linkedin.com/in/aftabs>

[http://eintellegonetworks.com/logos/ein09.png]
The Experts Who The Experts Call
Juniper - Arista - Cisco - Cumulus Linux - Cloud - Consulting

On 13 September 2016 at 10:49, Clay Quinn <cquinn at mrv.com<mailto:cquinn at mrv.com>> wrote:
Hi All,

An oddball question - is anyone using services over Internet to Israel (VPN etc), and if so what is your round-trip latency?  From a Telstra TID connection I’m getting around 400ms (Sydney, LA, New York, UK, France, Israel).  I’m curious if there’s a less-latent path on another provider/route (RDP sessions are painfully slow).

Using 30,000km as an estimate for the fibre distance, that gives a theoretical minimum latency of 300ms (0.5us/km * 30,000km * both directions).  So there’s an additional 100ms of overhead there (OEO conversions probably – 30 hops in traceroute).

If that’s par for the course, I guess WAN acceleration is really the only option – I understand it’s a pretty long path.  If anyone has any unique solutions to this problem I’d love to hear it.


Cheers
Clay

Clay Quinn
Presales Engineer
MRV Communications Pty Ltd.
Mobile: +61 427 339 000<tel:%2B61%20427%20339%20000>  | Email: cquinn at mrv.com<mailto:cquinn at mrv.com>
Skype: clayquinn | Web: www.mrv.com<http://www.mrv.com/>

[Screen Shot 2016-02-01 at 10.11.23]

[E-Banner]<http://www.mrv.com>


MRV Communications is a global supplier of packet and optical solutions that power the world’s largest networks. Our products combine innovative hardware with intelligent software to make networks smarter, faster and more efficient.


The contents of this message, together with any attachments, are intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom they are addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, immediately advise the sender, delete this message and any attachments and note that any distribution, or copying of this message, or any attachment, is prohibited.

_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net<mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog

[E-Banner]<http://www.mrv.com>


MRV Communications is a global supplier of packet and optical solutions that power the world’s largest networks. Our products combine innovative hardware with intelligent software to make networks smarter, faster and more efficient.



The contents of this message, together with any attachments, are intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom they are addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, immediately advise the sender, delete this message and any attachments and note that any distribution, or copying of this message, or any attachment, is prohibited.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20160913/cb03c601/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 13092 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20160913/cb03c601/attachment-0001.png>