[AusNOG] Aus Industry Congratulations Email

[Paul Wilkins]

I don't think service providers would or should be accepting the additional
responsibilities of DR lightly. There are pecuniary penalties for service
providers who fail to protect the information they are now compelled to
collect.

Obviously if the government is to hold service providers liable for
pecuniary penalties, it's entirely appropriate that businesses require
government to cover their full expenses for meeting the requirements of the
act. I think what this list demonstrates, is that many of the smaller
operators may in fact discover they have underestimated the cost of meeting
their obligations.

Kind regards

Paul Wilkins

On 5 September 2016 at 21:11, Stuart Low <stuart.low at me.com> wrote:

> Is S3 storage even an option? I haven’t really been following along here
> so I’m talking completely out of school but isn’t there privacy issues with
> storing in the cloud? If they add encryption to the mix then record size
> blows out 10-fold.
>
> Could the solutions deployed be optimised, I bet they could and I also bet
> a lot of the recipients will be supplying the headline price and decreasing
> the costs as much as possible. I also dare say that a lot of the recipients
> are evaluating it from a “professional services” delivery standpoint purely
> because giving the government what they want is distracting them from far
> more enterprising activities.
>
> I wonder if the government would have been better building a black box
> solution to be deployed in common datacentres and expect radius or ftp
> offload or something.  That way the government could centralise as
> required, manage it’s own vendors, have a consistent format it could
> change, the list goes on… Of course that sounds distinctly like a large
> communist country with a red flag…
>
> Stu
>
> On 5/09/2016, 19:44, "AusNOG on behalf of Tim Raphael" <
> ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net on behalf of raphael.timothy at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>     I'd be very interested to see the numbers on each ISPs estimated cost
> of long-term storage. I have a gut feeling a lot of quoted numbers will be
> far above even SSD speed S3 pricing! ;-)
>
>     And Brendan, I totally agree. It's outrageous the apparent sheer
> negligence with which some of these numbers have been awarded.
>
>     Regards,
>
>     Tim Raphael
>
>     >> On 5 Sep 2016, at 5:24 PM, Mark Smith <markzzzsmith at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>     >>
>     >> On 5 September 2016 at 19:18, Stuart Low <stuart.low at me.com> wrote:
>     >> I wonder if the big winners are purely because of size or their
> dominance in
>     >> the mobile space. I would expect the data storage requirements of
> 3/4G
>     >> sessions would be exponentially higher than fixed line.
>     >
>     > "A disadvantage of logging mappings is that CGNs under heavy usage
> may
>     >  produce large amounts of logs, which may require large storage
>     >  volume."
>     >
>     > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6888#section-4
>     >
>     >
>     >> Stu
>     >>
>     >> On 5 Sep 2016, at 6:31 PM, "paul+ausnog at oxygennetworks.com.au"
>     >> <paul+ausnog at oxygennetworks.com.au> wrote:
>     >>
>     >> +1
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> From: AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of
> Brent
>     >> Paddon
>     >> Sent: Monday, 5 September 2016 6:24 PM
>     >> To: Nick Evendor
>     >> Cc: ausnog at ausnog.net
>     >> Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Aus Industry Congratulations Email
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> https://www.ag.gov.au/NationalSecurity/
> DataRetention/Documents/DRIGP-recipients.pdf
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> Some of the people on that list should be ashamed of themselves for
> the $$
>     >> amounts they applied for/received IMHO.
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Nick Evendor <
> nickevendor at outlook.com>
>     >> wrote:
>     >>
>     >> Anyone else receive a email this afternoon from Data Retention?
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> I cannot believe they Government might actually follow through with
>     >> something for once.
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> Nick
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> _______________________________________________
>     >> AusNOG mailing list
>     >> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>     >> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> _______________________________________________
>     >> AusNOG mailing list
>     >> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>     >> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> _______________________________________________
>     >> AusNOG mailing list
>     >> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>     >> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > AusNOG mailing list
>     > AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>     > http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>     _______________________________________________
>     AusNOG mailing list
>     AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>     http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20160905/cdf883be/attachment.html>