[AusNOG] IPv6 defacto standards/conventions

[Paul Brooks]

On 25/11/2016 3:03 PM, Ryan Tucker wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Just wanted to see what the current thoughts are on IPv6 addressing. What people
> have found or tried, whats worked and what hasn't, etc.
>
> Do you use/prefer /64s or /126s for interconnects?
> Are people dividing customers in to receiving a /64, /56 or /48, or just handing out
> /48s to everyone?
> How are customers handling addresses on endpoints without NAT (small sites
> multihoming, etc., is NPT popular?)
> Speaking of small multihoming, are ISPs/IXs accepting /48s in general, and if so do
> you see this leading to customers with a /48 from their ISP (of which there will be
> many) looking to peer publicly, and is that something you'd entertain?
> Do you see the inherent routeability of IPv6 affecting the appeal of "private WANs"?
>
> Didn't mean for that to sound like an interrogation, just got on a roll ;-)
You may have already found many of these, but in case - worth a read:

IPv6 Best Current Practices, from APNIC   
https://www.apnic.net/community/ipv6-program/ipv6-bcp
IPv6 Address Allocation BCP, from ARIN    
https://getipv6.info/display/IPv6/IPv6+Address+Allocation+BCP

Paul.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: paul_brooks.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 303 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20161125/d2d601e2/attachment.vcf>