[AusNOG] Internet companies forced to block The Pirate Bay, bittorrent websites in Australia, Federal Court rules

Bradley Amm brad at bradleyamm.com
Tue Dec 20 12:42:00 EST 2016


https://www.playerattack.com/news/2016/12/16/92893/aussie-pirate-bay-ban-massive-collateral-damage/


From: AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of Jay Dixon
Sent: Monday, 19 December 2016 7:23 AM
To: Chris Ford
Cc: ausnog at ausnog.net
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Internet companies forced to block The Pirate Bay, bittorrent websites in Australia, Federal Court rules

i love that the byproduct of this court case is a comprehensive list of all the good torrent sites and mirrors.

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Chris Ford <chris.ford at inaboxgroup.com.au<mailto:chris.ford at inaboxgroup.com.au>> wrote:
I've been following this here https://s115a.com/cases/current

From my skim of the lists the respondents to the actions all roll up to Telstra, Optus, Vocus or TPG). I didn't see any independent ISPs listed. So unless you are a group company of the Big 4 you won’t be a recipient of the orders, and if you are, I'm sure you are already well aware of what is going on.


-----Original Message-----
From: AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net<mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net>] On Behalf Of Mark Newton
Sent: Friday, 16 December 2016 2:41 PM
To: Ross Wheeler <ausnog at rossw.net<mailto:ausnog at rossw.net>>
Cc: ausnog at ausnog.net<mailto:ausnog at ausnog.net>
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Internet companies forced to block The Pirate Bay, bittorrent websites in Australia, Federal Court rules
On Dec 15, 2016, at 4:56 PM, Ross Wheeler <ausnog at rossw.net<mailto:ausnog at rossw.net>> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2016, Nathan Brookfield wrote:
>
>> The Federal Court has ordered internet companies to block five copyright-infringing websites, including torrent website The Pirate Bay.
>
> So, the next questions are:
> * who tells us ISPs officially, what we have to block?

A court order.

> * when do they tell us.

After you have been named as a respondent in a Federal Court action, and been presented with an order.

> * does it only apply to the big-few, or everyone?

It applies to everyone who is named as a respondent in a Federal Court action under s115a and has subsequently received a court order.

> * if the previous answer is "everyone", who do we bill,
>   and do we have to "trust them" that it'll be paid, or can
>   we just send them the bill and not do anything until it is?

The previous answer isn’t “everyone.” You bill the claimant. The payment conditions will be in the court order.

> The phrase "tilting at windmills" springs to mind.

Yes, pointless exercise. Training Australians to use evasion methods; once they’re doing that, further enforcement action is ineffective, so driving them in that direction is practically indistinguishable from saying, “Meh, don’t care anymore.”

The overwhelming response I’ve seen to yesterday’s action is, “LOL.” I’m encouraged by that.

   - mark


_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net<mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net<mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20161220/fd062185/attachment.html>


More information about the AusNOG mailing list