[AusNOG] Legal Challenge To Meta Data Laws

[Philip Loenneker]

Sorry for covering a topic you've already thrashed out, as I said I'm new to the list. 

The difficulty I think I will have is reaching a consensus with my colleagues... I don't want to implement things we don't need and then find we aren't covering things we DO need. I'll find out if anyone has actually submitted anything to the CAC for approval first I think.

Thanks everyone who provided their thoughts. 

Regards,
Philip 

-----Original Message-----
From: AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of Ross Wheeler
Sent: Thursday, 17 September 2015 3:28 PM
To: Paul Wilkins <paulwilkins369 at gmail.com>
Cc: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Legal Challenge To Meta Data Laws



On Thu, 17 Sep 2015, Paul Wilkins wrote:

> The FAQ is Attorney General's view of the Act, but not conclusive.
>
> What you're actually required to do, is submit and implement a data 
> retention plan to the CAC,

Actually, even that's not *completely* correct.
You need to be "compliant with the act" by the 13th. If you WON'T be fully compliant by then, you have the option of submitting a DRIP (details of how you INTEND to be compliant, timeframes, etc). IF your DRIP is submitted and accepted/approved by the 13th (remember they need 60 days to assess it), then you are still compliant.

The remaining condition is that you DON'T submit a DRIP, you are then ASSUMED to be fully compliant by the 13th - and you had better be!


> I am not a lawyer. This is not expert advice.

Ditto.

_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog