[AusNOG] Cisco BRI Acting as Provider

[Paul Wilkins]

Andrew,
If you're using the same codecs, BRI or PRI makes no difference. In my
experience, Cisco is really good at abstracting the hardware from IOS.

Kind regards

Paul Wilkins

On 1 September 2015 at 01:04, Andrew Barbara <andrew at focusnet.com.au> wrote:

> HI Paul,
>
>
>
> Thanks for your email.
>
>
>
> We are just wanting voice, no modem / data.
>
>
>
> Installed in the router is a PVDM2-32 – should this suffice in your
> experience?
>
> Its all we’ve needed in PRI configs in the past.
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] *On Behalf Of *Paul
> Wilkins
> *Sent:* Monday, 31 August 2015 9:34 PM
> *To:* ausnog at ausnog.net
> *Subject:* Re: [AusNOG] Cisco BRI Acting as Provider
>
>
>
> Might want to check your PVDM. You'll get more joy with a PVDM2-24DM than
> a PVDM2-12DM. Should work like a charm.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Paul Wilkins
>
>
>
> On 31 August 2015 at 18:55, Andrew Barbara <andrew at focusnet.com.au> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> Sorry for the noise…
>
>
>
> Looking to configure a Cisco router (say 2811 with VIC-2BRI-NT/TE) as a
> SIP to BRI gateway (To an existing Panasonic PBX)
>
>
>
> The customer already has the router so would be good to re-use if possible.
>
>
>
> Done this a few times with PRI / E1 but getting some strange things with
> the BRIs.
>
>
>
> Anyone done this before, or know of an alternative device that has 8 BRI
> ports and can handle all 16 open channels?
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20150901/13455301/attachment.html>