[AusNOG] BiLateral Peering Via MegaPort and/or NSW-IX

[daniel at glovine.com.au]

Still better for redundancy sake to Bilaterally peer.  Unless im proven
wrong?

Daniel

-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph Goldman [mailto:joe at apcs.com.au] 
Sent: Friday, 6 March 2015 2:22 PM
To: daniel at glovine.com.au; 'Matthew Moyle-Croft'
Cc: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] BiLateral Peering Via MegaPort and/or NSW-IX

There's also a considerable size difference, and advantage between your
network and Microsofts.

You also advertise to route-servers, so we all get your routes, unlike
Microsoft :)

On 06/03/15 14:19, daniel at glovine.com.au wrote:
> I agree,
>
> Microsoft was asking for peers, same what im doing..  Yet not everyone 
> jumps up and down at them?  Hmmm
>
> Anyways please keep this on-topic,  And thanks to MMC for Peering :D
>
> Daniel
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of 
> Matthew Moyle-Croft
> Sent: Friday, 6 March 2015 2:09 PM
> To: Joseph Goldman
> Cc: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
> Subject: Re: [AusNOG] BiLateral Peering Via MegaPort and/or NSW-IX
>
> Not all networks participate in Route Servers.
>
> The company I work for does not participate in them as a matter of policy.
> Microsoft, for example as well, emailed AUSNOG not that long ago 
> saying the same thing.
>
> MMC
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>