[AusNOG] SPAM-MED: Re: Welcome to Metadata Retention

[Kristoffer Sheather @ CloudCentral]

Ok, fair point that.
  

----------------------------------------
 From: "Paul Julian" <paul at oxygennetworks.com.au>
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 4:47 PM
To:
Cc: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
Subject: SPAM-MED: Re: [AusNOG] Welcome to Metadata Retention   

It has to be encrypted as part of the legislation Kris  

   

Regards  

Paul  

   

From: AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of 
Kristoffer Sheather @ CloudCentral
Sent: Friday, 27 February 2015 4:44 PM
To: Phillip Grasso
Cc: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Welcome to Metadata Retention  

    

Don't bother encrypting it, they probably either have the keys (or compel 
you to provide them) and/or can break the encryption. 

  

  

Regards,
Kristoffer Sheather 

  

----------------------------------------

From: "Phillip Grasso" <phillip.grasso at gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 4:42 PM
To: kris at cloudcentral.com.au
Cc: "Peter Lawler" <ausnog at bleeter.id.au>, "ausnog at lists.ausnog.net" 
<ausnog at lists.ausnog.net>
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Welcome to Metadata Retention    

  

did they specify what kind of storage conditions it needs to be stored 
under?     

  

If not do it cheap as possible to keep costs to customers as long as 
possible; that sounds like jbod or a raid0 array[encrypted of course]  

     

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Kristoffer Sheather @ CloudCentral 
<kristoffer.sheather at cloudcentral.com.au> wrote:    

That's exactly what they should do, isn't the government supposed to be all 
about "transparency" :) ? 

  

Regards,
Kristoffer Sheather 

  

----------------------------------------

From: "Phillip Grasso" <phillip.grasso at gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 4:38 PM
To: "Peter Lawler" <ausnog at bleeter.id.au>
Cc: "ausnog at lists.ausnog.net" <ausnog at lists.ausnog.net>
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Welcome to Metadata Retention      

  

who's gonna pay for this? any increase in compliance costs normally end up 
costing the customer.     

  

Wouldn't it be funny if most of the ISP's put on their bill notices:  

  

Mandatory Government Metadata surcharge tax^H^H^H: ~+$2  

     

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Peter Lawler <ausnog at bleeter.id.au> wrote: 
  

On 27/02/15 13:21, Matt Perkins wrote:
>
> I have one prediction the roll out of this is going to be the biggest
> debacle since pink bats.

Loathed to mention it as it's arguably OT, but there's a piece doing the
rounds at the moment about the cost of the eHealth record stuff and how
underutilised it has been by the general population.

As such, I think you're missing the relevant debacle comparator.

Pete.     

_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20150227/df55e5b2/attachment.html>