[AusNOG] NSWIX Peering

Wed Dec 2 16:10:01 EST 2015

Agreed.  We are on Equinix IX, NSW-IX and ACT-IX.  Were previously on 
Megaport IX but couldn't justify the $500/month port charge.

 Haven't bothered with PIPE-IX as we already have AAPT transit as well.

  Regards,
Kristoffer Sheather

----------------------------------------
 From: "Matthew Enger" <m.enger at xi.com.au>
Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2015 4:06 PM
To: "kristoffer.sheather at cloudcentral.com.au" 
<kristoffer.sheather at cloudcentral.com.au>, "ausnog at lists.ausnog.net" 
<ausnog at lists.ausnog.net>
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] NSWIX Peering   
  I am currently on Equinix IX in Victoria and Internet-IX VIC, Equinix-IX 
in Victoria is not worth anything yet, but but that will change maybe in 
2-3 years.

 Internet-IX in Vic has been fantastic, well worth it.

Matthew  Enger | Managing Director
			PO Box 3279, The Pines, Victoria, 3109
			T 1300 789 299  D 03 9909 3104 M 0406 532 792 F 03 8611 7946 
			m.enger at xi.com.au |  www.xi.com.au  				  		

This email message and any attachments are the property of X Integration. 
The contents of this email are copyright and may also be confidential 
and/or legally privileged. They are intended solely for the addressee and 
it is not intended that either confidentiality or privilege be waived or 
lost by mistaken delivery to you. Please notify us immediately and delete 
this communication if received in error. Consider the environment before 
printing this email. 
   From: "Kristoffer Sheather @ CloudCentral" 
<kristoffer.sheather at cloudcentral.com.au>
Reply-To: "kristoffer.sheather at cloudcentral.com.au" 
<kristoffer.sheather at cloudcentral.com.au>
Date: Wednesday, 2 December 2015 at 3:56 PM
To: "ausnog at lists.ausnog.net" <ausnog at lists.ausnog.net>
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] NSWIX Peering

     What are peoples view on IX Australia vs Megaport IX vs Equinix IX - 
does anyone have all IX's or just one or the other, and why?

  Regards,
Kristoffer Sheather

----------------------------------------
 From: "Joseph Goldman" <joe at apcs.com.au>
Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2015 3:48 PM
To: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] NSWIX Peering    
 As a consumer network, I no longer saw value in PIPE IX a while ago - very 
different for a hosting network as TPG are a large number of consumer 
population, but given Google, Apple, Netflix, Akamai, Cloudflare, Amazon, 
Microsoft etc are all on at least 1 or 2 of NSW-IX, EIE or MegaIX, then I 
saw no need for PIPE and its expensive price tag.

I actually calculated the other day, at my current average combined usage 
and cost of the 3 IX's I peer with, it works out about 40% cheaper per mbit 
compared to my transit costs, but obviously has lots of room for growth at 
the same fixed cost so that will only get better. IX's also account for 
40-60% of my inbound traffic also, so definitely cheap!
    On 02/12/15 15:38, Matt Perkins wrote:
    'TPG advertise some of subnets here'.  - "some" being the key word 
here.  There on their last legs with us. Between IXAU and Megaport there 
effectively useless.

Matt.

On 2/12/2015 2:16 PM, Nathan Brookfield wrote:

There are a lot of people industry wide trying to determine whether they 
should start dropping the PIPE fabric nationally with the only legitimate 
reason being 'TPG advertise some of subnets here'.    
Good question Shane!

----------------------------------------
 From: Shane Short <shane at short.id.au>
Sent: Wednesday, 2 December 2015 2:14 PM
To: Nathan Brookfield
Cc: Joseph Goldman;  ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] NSWIX Peering     

 Hijacking this a little bit, what do people actually look for when you're 
deciding what IXP you should peer with? Is it table size, traffic volume, 
or a specific peer that's on the fabric?

I've always peered with WAIX because that's just what we had, but i'm 
curious what metrics people care about when you have a choice.

-Shane

Nathan Brookfield wrote:     

Hi Gavin,  

I think Joe's figures may be a little off, the routing table is 
approximately:  

RS1 v4: 14343  

RS2 v4: 14337 
RS1 v6: 943 RS2 v6: 943    
   Many Thanks,
   Nathan Brookfield 

----------------------------------------
 From: AusNOG  <ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net> on behalf of Joseph 
Goldman  <joe at apcs.com.au>
Sent: Wednesday, 2 December 2015 12:43 PM
To:  ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] NSWIX Peering     

 My sessions currently show:

RS1 v4: 14242
RS2 v4: 14236

RS1 v6: 943
RS2 v6: 943
    On 02/12/15 12:36, Gavin Davis (GC) wrote:

Would anyone be able to tell me the size of the NSWIX route table (v4 & v6) 

Regards  

Gavin  

 This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please delete it from your system, do not use or 
disclose the information in any way, and notify the sender immediately.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and 
may not be the views of Foxtel, unless specifically stated. No warranty is 
made that the e-mail or attachment (s) are free from computer viruses or 
other defects.

 _______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list 
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.nethttp://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog    

 _______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list 
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.nethttp://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog   

 _______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list 
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.nethttp://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog      

 -- /* Matt Perkins         Direct 1300 137 379        Spectrum Networks 
Ptd. Ltd.         Office 1300 133 299        matt at spectrum.com.au           
                         Level 6, 350 George Street Sydney 2000         
Spectrum Networks is a member of the Communications Alliance & TIO */       

 _______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list 
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.nethttp://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog   

Message protected by MailGuard: e-mail anti-virus, anti-spam and content 
filtering.
http://www.mailguard.com.au/mg 
Report this message as spam  

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20151202/1c74ff21/attachment.html>