[AusNOG] IPv6

[Robert Hudson]

On 01/04/2015 10:15 AM, "Anthony Bortolotto" <a.bortolotto at infinite.net.au>
wrote:
>
> ISPs are hesitant because either they don't understand themselves or
don't want to have educate their customers. It’s the humans, not the tech
that is the issue.

There is little to no customer education required for dual-stack. My
grandmother had IPv6, but wouldn't know (or care), nor does she have to do
anything different to what she did before she started receiving an IPv6
allocation.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of Mark
Delany
> Sent: Wednesday, 1 April 2015 9:20 AM
> To: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
> Subject: Re: [AusNOG] IPv6
>
> On 01Apr15, Mark Andrews allegedly wrote:
> >
> > In message <CAOu9xNJbkKhU3DbTjmX1LG5hcpx+uS-6XxOjajd3rS=
wHEurFg at mail.gmail.com>, Robert Hudson writes:
> > >
> > > Right now, it seems that some ISPs/carriers are deciding to invest
> > > in NAT/PAT (or CGN, if that's really a thing) rather than IPv6.  Why?
>
> > No, its been selected because ISPs as a whole have procastinated about
> > delivering IPv6
>
> Not sure it's an either/or situation. Even if you deploy IPv6 everywhere
you still have to offer IPv4 reachability for your customers.
>
> Hopefully what Robert is observing is not an alternative to IPv6, rather
it's a means of giving customers access to those recalcitrant IPv4-only
destinations.
>
> On the bright side, the more IPv6 you deploy the less traffic will need
to pass through your CGN. IOWs, deploying IPV6 could actually save you some
coin!
>
>
> Mark.
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20150401/1031caa2/attachment.html>