[AusNOG] IPv6

[Kristoffer Sheather]

++

> On 1 Apr 2015, at 10:14 am, Anthony Bortolotto <a.bortolotto at infinite.net.au> wrote:
> 
> ISPs are hesitant because either they don't understand themselves or don't want to have educate their customers. It’s the humans, not the tech that is the issue.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of Mark Delany
> Sent: Wednesday, 1 April 2015 9:20 AM
> To: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
> Subject: Re: [AusNOG] IPv6
> 
>> On 01Apr15, Mark Andrews allegedly wrote:
>> 
>> In message <CAOu9xNJbkKhU3DbTjmX1LG5hcpx+uS-6XxOjajd3rS=wHEurFg at mail.gmail.com>, Robert Hudson writes:
>>> 
>>> Right now, it seems that some ISPs/carriers are deciding to invest 
>>> in NAT/PAT (or CGN, if that's really a thing) rather than IPv6.  Why?
> 
>> No, its been selected because ISPs as a whole have procastinated about 
>> delivering IPv6
> 
> Not sure it's an either/or situation. Even if you deploy IPv6 everywhere you still have to offer IPv4 reachability for your customers.
> 
> Hopefully what Robert is observing is not an alternative to IPv6, rather it's a means of giving customers access to those recalcitrant IPv4-only destinations.
> 
> On the bright side, the more IPv6 you deploy the less traffic will need to pass through your CGN. IOWs, deploying IPV6 could actually save you some coin!
> 
> 
> Mark.
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog