[AusNOG] Data retention definitions
John Lindsay
johnslindsay at mac.com
Fri Sep 26 07:02:14 EST 2014
I think you're confusing cause and effect.
John Lindsay
> On 26 Sep 2014, at 1:40 am, Skeeve Stevens <skeeve+ausnog at eintellegonetworks.com> wrote:
>
> Is this John Brandis, our Attorney General a complete idiot?
>
> I bet once the terror alert is reduced these laws won't be repealed.
>
>
>
> ...Skeeve
>
> Skeeve Stevens - eintellego Networks Pty Ltd
> skeeve at eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com
> Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
> facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ; linkedin.com/in/skeeve
> twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com
>
> The Experts Who The Experts Call
> Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering
>
>> On 26 September 2014 01:56, Ben Grubb <bgrubb at fairfaxmedia.com.au> wrote:
>> More fun on this front
>>
>> From The Australian:
>> ONLINE communication sites including social-media services Twitter and Facebook will be drawn into a planned updated version of the federal government’s anti-terror data-retention push.
>> ....
>> “Data-retention obligations should not be limited to licensed carriers but should also extend to any entity that provides communications services to the Australian public,” the paper says.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ben Grubb
>>
>>> On 31 August 2014 13:14, Tom Berryman <Tom at connectivityit.com.au> wrote:
>>> Seems as though we are getting some clarity on who will have access to our stored metadata:
>>>
>>> http://www.theage.com.au/it-pro/security-it/australia-reaching-for-more-metadata-lets-some-slip-20140828-109jjf.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> EVERYONE and ANYONE!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Tom.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of Skeeve Stevens
>>> Sent: Saturday, 30 August 2014 10:34 AM
>>> To: Bevan Slattery
>>> Cc: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
>>> Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Data retention definitions
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ice Bucket Metadata Challenge? Nah... people would wimp out :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ...Skeeve
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Skeeve Stevens - eintellego Networks Pty Ltd
>>>
>>> skeeve at eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com
>>>
>>> Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
>>> facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ; linkedin.com/in/skeeve
>>> twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com
>>>
>>> The Experts Who The Experts Call
>>> Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 30 August 2014 09:12, Bevan Slattery <bevan at slattery.net.au> wrote:
>>>
>>> We as an industry should get our **** together, come up with an advertising campaign that illustrates the problem and in simple writing/video and email the 3,000,000 subscribers/users that we have apart from Telstra and Optus.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We should have a "metadata" day in which we undertake significant activities such as all change our our home pages to a metadata landing page to draw attention to this with a video demonstrating the issue at large.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Posting to AUSNOG is not going to help and don't expect businesses to get involved because we haven't helped them understand why they should be concerned.
>>>
>>>
>>> [b]
>>>
>>>
>>> On 30 Aug 2014, at 8:47 am, David Beveridge <dave at bevhost.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Mark Newton <newton at atdot.dotat.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> The group of businesses in this forum will only be tasked to store the data if the proposal gets up.
>>>
>>> The proposal is less likely to get up if there is a broad campaign against it.
>>>
>>> You're talking about post apocalyptic practicalities. I'm talking about showing leadership to make sure the war doesn't start in the first place.
>>>
>>> - mark
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Perhaps we should be getting the business community behind this effort.
>>>
>>> I'm sure corporates and small business alike are not geared up to collect and store all this data.
>>>
>>> From memory, the requirement is that all "entities" be required to store the "metadata".
>>>
>>> I can see any reason why any "entity" who runs a NAT gateway would be exempt from this.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> AusNOG mailing list
>>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> AusNOG mailing list
>>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> AusNOG mailing list
>>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>
>>
>> The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying files is or may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, dissemination, reliance, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail or any attached files is unauthorised. This e-mail is subject to copyright. No part of it should be reproduced, adapted or communicated without the written consent of the copyright owner. If you have received this e-mail in error please advise the sender immediately by return e-mail or telephone and delete all copies. Fairfax Media does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information contained in this e-mail or attached files. Internet communications are not secure, therefore Fairfax Media does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message or attached files.
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20140926/c5a67fdc/attachment.html>
More information about the AusNOG
mailing list