[AusNOG] Fibre run between Buildings

[Paul van den Bergen]

I have a theory... it's so they can guarantee they have someone to
prosecute.

Also using "Being cashed up enough to afford a license" as a proxy for
"responsible enough not to stuff up"...

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Sam Sarkis-UIP <ssarkis at unitedip.net.au>
wrote:

>  That’s where the need to pay a monthly fee to the council, and also they
> have to adhere to certain standards put in place by federal government not
> state so it Is uniform Australia wide.
>
>
>
> My 2 cents.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* James Spenceley [mailto:james at iroute.org]
> *Sent:* Thursday, 16 October 2014 5:28 PM
> *To:* Sam Sarkis-UIP
> *Cc:* Mark Newton; Paul Brooks; ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
> *Subject:* Re: [AusNOG] Fibre run between Buildings
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  I don’t think it is fair if they own both buildings and if it is for
> their own internal use and not to resell.  I still believe they need to
> adhere to certain standards but don’t believe you should be a carrier for
> your own internal purpose.
>
>
>
> to be fair, they don't own the land in between the buildings.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>


-- 
Dr Paul van den Bergen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20141016/efd80389/attachment.html>