[AusNOG] PIPE NSW Changing Details

Luke Iggleden luke+ausnog at sisgroup.com.au
Wed Oct 1 14:12:32 EST 2014


There are many overlapping routes between all the NSW sites anyway.

PIPE peering is well worth it for us as its a direct route to TPG and a 
lot of traffic still egresses us to TPG, more than via megaport which 
has the highest local pref. PIPE NSW for us still has the highest 
traffic of all peering networks (with the lowest LP) outbound for us by 
a significant margin.

Routes counts from our NSW sites listed in AS38220 LocalPref order:

Megaport
103.26.68.1
   peering.inet.0: 3623/4408/4408/0

ix-australia
218.100.52.1           7606
   peering.inet.0: 1940/7887/7887/0


Equinix
202.167.228.122       24115
   peering.inet.0: 2152/11533/11533/0


PIPE
218.100.2.1
   peering.inet.0: 2049/11140/11140/0


PIPE NSW is a close second behind Equinix with table size. Megaport is 
the lowest.




On 1/10/2014 1:47 pm, Brad Evans wrote:
> I'm guessing that if you turn off NSW-IX that the vast majority of that
> traffic would then move over to Equinix and Megaport.
>
> For us we see 90/10 traffic split between Equinix and PIPE-IX in NSW.
> If we bring down our session on Equinix, most of the traffic (~95%)
> moves over to PIPE-IX anyway. It appears our main traffic sources prefer
> to send traffic to our AS via Equinix rather than PIPE-IX.
>
> -Brad
>
>
> On 1/10/2014 1:24 PM, Tom Berryman wrote:
>>
>> In NSW presently:
>>
>> Equinix - 11609
>>
>> NSW-IX - 7967
>>
>> Megaport – 4495
>>
>> --we don’t have PIPE there.
>>
>> NSW-IX sees the highest inbound for us by about 200% over the next.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> *From:*AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] *On Behalf Of
>> *Skeeve Stevens
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 1 October 2014 12:20 PM
>> *To:* Bevan Slattery
>> *Cc:* AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net; Joshua Munro; Belinda Flanders
>> *Subject:* Re: [AusNOG] PIPE NSW Changing Details
>>
>> *BAM!*
>>
>> Go Megaport.
>>
>> $250 peering only (1Gb)
>>
>> $500 peering + VxC capability (10Gb)
>>
>> News worthy day!
>>
>> I wonder how long till Pipe Peering dies... most networks we run have
>> disconnected from it... Megaport and EQ cover most things.  I hear IX
>> is good, but not had the opportunity to connect up someone yet... will
>> soon.
>>
>> I'd love to see a route differential between all 4 on a state by
>> state.. I wonder if someone could do a snapshot analysis. I'm most
>> interested in NSW.
>>
>> I'd like to see what is and isn't on each peering.
>>
>>
>>
>> ...Skeeve
>>
>> *Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd
>>
>> skeeve at eintellegonetworks.com <mailto:skeeve at eintellegonetworks.com> ;
>> www.eintellegonetworks.com <http://www.eintellegonetworks.com/>
>>
>> Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
>>
>> facebook.com/eintellegonetworks
>> <http://facebook.com/eintellegonetworks> ; linkedin.com/in/skeeve
>> <http://linkedin.com/in/skeeve>
>>
>> twitter.com/theispguy <http://twitter.com/theispguy> ; blog:
>> www.theispguy.com <http://www.theispguy.com/>
>>
>> The Experts Who The Experts Call
>>
>> Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering
>>
>> On 1 October 2014 12:15, Bevan Slattery <bevan at slattery.net.au
>> <mailto:bevan at slattery.net.au>> wrote:
>>
>>     To make life easy as of today we are doing a 1Gbps IX only port
>>     for $250/month no contract, no membership, no install.  Also will
>>     have a number of major content providers coming on net in next 30
>>     days which would mean there won't be much that's not on either.
>>
>>     Agree that it's time to switch :)
>>
>>     Cheers
>>
>>     [b]
>>
>>
>>     On 1 Oct 2014, at 11:42 am, Craig Askings <craig at askings.com.au
>>     <mailto:craig at askings.com.au>> wrote:
>>
>>         Does PIPE-IX even offer a worthwhile product anymore? Since an
>>         IX’s value is in it’s peers and it’s ability to connect them.
>>         Who is left on PIPE IX that isn’t available on Megaport and
>>         IX-AU? How many clients are going to be exiting over the next
>>         24 months as their contracts expire?
>>
>>         On 1 Oct 2014, at 11:29 am, Bob Woolley <boblobsta at gmail.com
>>         <mailto:boblobsta at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>             PIPE has absolutely gone to crap.
>>
>>             Just shy of 4 weeks since our issue on QLD-IX and they are
>>             still trying to figure out how to make the TPG router on
>>             QLD-IX perform basic ARP functions (I only mention this as
>>             this job is being directly managed by PIPE).
>>
>>             I don't know about you guys but if we had an ARP issue on
>>             a router for more than a few minutes I would be highly
>>             embarrassed.
>>
>>             IX-AU A++
>>
>>             Megaport A++
>>
>>             Cheers,
>>
>>             Bob W
>>
>>             On 1 October 2014 11:18, Sam Silvester
>>             <sam.silvester at gmail.com <mailto:sam.silvester at gmail.com>>
>>             wrote:
>>
>>                 +1 to what John said.
>>
>>                 This kind of thing leads to my personal view that that
>>                 PIPE IX isn't really a thing any longer, what with
>>                 other IXes actually offering customer service that
>>                 allows you to get on with the job.
>>
>>                 On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:09 AM, John Lindsay
>>                 <johnslindsay at mac.com <mailto:johnslindsay at mac.com>>
>>                 wrote:
>>
>>                     Which means your work-around is more likely to
>>                     cause their fabric to break later when your old
>>                     box is recycled by someone else. Change control
>>                     policy as substitute for customer service is
>>                     actually just crap customer service.
>>
>>                     John Lindsay
>>
>>
>>                     > On 1 Oct 2014, at 10:21 am, Brad Gould
>>                     <bradley at internode.com.au
>>                     <mailto:bradley at internode.com.au>> wrote:
>>                     >
>>                     > My understanding is that this is all about their
>>                     change control policy.
>>                     >
>>                     > Change the MAC on your router and book a window
>>                     to change it back to the native MAC when Pipe can
>>                     get their process sorted.
>>                     >
>>                     > Brad
>>                     >
>>                     >
>>                     >
>>                     >
>>                     > -----Original Message-----
>>                     > From: AusNOG
>>                     [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net
>>                     <mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net>] On
>>                     Behalf Of Chris Chaundy
>>                     > Sent: Wednesday, 1 October 2014 09:36
>>                     > To: Joseph Goldman
>>                     > Cc: AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>>                     <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
>>                     > Subject: Re: [AusNOG] PIPE NSW Changing Details
>>                     >
>>                     > Dependent on your make of router, it may just be
>>                     easier to change the MAC address for the interface
>>                     on the new router to match the old router's one.
>>                     >
>>                     > Sent from my iPhone
>>                     >
>>                     >> On 1 Oct 2014, at 9:15, Joseph Goldman
>>                     <joe at apcs.com.au <mailto:joe at apcs.com.au>> wrote:
>>                     >>
>>                     >> Hi list,
>>                     >>
>>                     >> I am just wondering if this is normal - trying
>>                     to change MAC address for router port after urgent
>>                     change-over for our PIPE peering connection in
>>                     NSW, request was sent through to the MACD team but
>>                     they are telling me the request needs to be
>>                     approved by their management and ETA is 3-5
>>                     business days??
>>                     >>
>>                     >> I'm not a massive user of PIPE IX but I have
>>                     now been without it for 24 hours and its looking
>>                     like it could be another 48-72 hours before
>>                     getting it back! For someone who might get a LOT
>>                     of their traffic via PIPE IX this would be a
>>                     pretty bad amount of downtime, as other transit
>>                     links would have to pick up the slack.
>>                     >>
>>                     >> If any PIPE engineers on list willing to help
>>                     the request move a little quicker I'd appreciate it.
>>                     >>
>>                     >> Thanks,
>>                     >> Joe
>>                     >> _______________________________________________
>>                     >> AusNOG mailing list
>>                     >> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>>                     <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
>>                     >> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>                     > _______________________________________________
>>                     > AusNOG mailing list
>>                     > AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>>                     <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
>>                     > http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>                     > _______________________________________________
>>                     > AusNOG mailing list
>>                     > AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>>                     <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
>>                     > http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>                     _______________________________________________
>>                     AusNOG mailing list
>>                     AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>>                     <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
>>                     http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>
>>
>>                 _______________________________________________
>>                 AusNOG mailing list
>>                 AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
>>                 http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>
>>             _______________________________________________
>>             AusNOG mailing list
>>             AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
>>             http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         AusNOG mailing list
>>         AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
>>         http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     AusNOG mailing list
>>     AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
>>     http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AusNOG mailing list
>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>



More information about the AusNOG mailing list