[AusNOG] PIPE NSW Changing Details
Brad Evans
brad at delion.com.au
Wed Oct 1 13:47:49 EST 2014
I'm guessing that if you turn off NSW-IX that the vast majority of that
traffic would then move over to Equinix and Megaport.
For us we see 90/10 traffic split between Equinix and PIPE-IX in NSW.
If we bring down our session on Equinix, most of the traffic (~95%)
moves over to PIPE-IX anyway. It appears our main traffic sources prefer
to send traffic to our AS via Equinix rather than PIPE-IX.
-Brad
On 1/10/2014 1:24 PM, Tom Berryman wrote:
>
> In NSW presently:
>
> Equinix - 11609
>
> NSW-IX - 7967
>
> Megaport – 4495
>
> --we don’t have PIPE there.
>
> NSW-IX sees the highest inbound for us by about 200% over the next.
>
> Tom
>
> *From:*AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] *On Behalf Of
> *Skeeve Stevens
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 1 October 2014 12:20 PM
> *To:* Bevan Slattery
> *Cc:* AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net; Joshua Munro; Belinda Flanders
> *Subject:* Re: [AusNOG] PIPE NSW Changing Details
>
> *BAM!*
>
> Go Megaport.
>
> $250 peering only (1Gb)
>
> $500 peering + VxC capability (10Gb)
>
> News worthy day!
>
> I wonder how long till Pipe Peering dies... most networks we run have
> disconnected from it... Megaport and EQ cover most things. I hear IX
> is good, but not had the opportunity to connect up someone yet... will
> soon.
>
> I'd love to see a route differential between all 4 on a state by
> state.. I wonder if someone could do a snapshot analysis. I'm most
> interested in NSW.
>
> I'd like to see what is and isn't on each peering.
>
>
>
> ...Skeeve
>
> *Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd
>
> skeeve at eintellegonetworks.com <mailto:skeeve at eintellegonetworks.com> ;
> www.eintellegonetworks.com <http://www.eintellegonetworks.com/>
>
> Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
>
> facebook.com/eintellegonetworks
> <http://facebook.com/eintellegonetworks> ; linkedin.com/in/skeeve
> <http://linkedin.com/in/skeeve>
>
> twitter.com/theispguy <http://twitter.com/theispguy> ; blog:
> www.theispguy.com <http://www.theispguy.com/>
>
> The Experts Who The Experts Call
>
> Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering
>
> On 1 October 2014 12:15, Bevan Slattery <bevan at slattery.net.au
> <mailto:bevan at slattery.net.au>> wrote:
>
> To make life easy as of today we are doing a 1Gbps IX only port
> for $250/month no contract, no membership, no install. Also will
> have a number of major content providers coming on net in next 30
> days which would mean there won't be much that's not on either.
>
> Agree that it's time to switch :)
>
> Cheers
>
> [b]
>
>
> On 1 Oct 2014, at 11:42 am, Craig Askings <craig at askings.com.au
> <mailto:craig at askings.com.au>> wrote:
>
> Does PIPE-IX even offer a worthwhile product anymore? Since an
> IX’s value is in it’s peers and it’s ability to connect them.
> Who is left on PIPE IX that isn’t available on Megaport and
> IX-AU? How many clients are going to be exiting over the next
> 24 months as their contracts expire?
>
> On 1 Oct 2014, at 11:29 am, Bob Woolley <boblobsta at gmail.com
> <mailto:boblobsta at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> PIPE has absolutely gone to crap.
>
> Just shy of 4 weeks since our issue on QLD-IX and they are
> still trying to figure out how to make the TPG router on
> QLD-IX perform basic ARP functions (I only mention this as
> this job is being directly managed by PIPE).
>
> I don't know about you guys but if we had an ARP issue on
> a router for more than a few minutes I would be highly
> embarrassed.
>
> IX-AU A++
>
> Megaport A++
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bob W
>
> On 1 October 2014 11:18, Sam Silvester
> <sam.silvester at gmail.com <mailto:sam.silvester at gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> +1 to what John said.
>
> This kind of thing leads to my personal view that that
> PIPE IX isn't really a thing any longer, what with
> other IXes actually offering customer service that
> allows you to get on with the job.
>
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:09 AM, John Lindsay
> <johnslindsay at mac.com <mailto:johnslindsay at mac.com>>
> wrote:
>
> Which means your work-around is more likely to
> cause their fabric to break later when your old
> box is recycled by someone else. Change control
> policy as substitute for customer service is
> actually just crap customer service.
>
> John Lindsay
>
>
> > On 1 Oct 2014, at 10:21 am, Brad Gould
> <bradley at internode.com.au
> <mailto:bradley at internode.com.au>> wrote:
> >
> > My understanding is that this is all about their
> change control policy.
> >
> > Change the MAC on your router and book a window
> to change it back to the native MAC when Pipe can
> get their process sorted.
> >
> > Brad
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: AusNOG
> [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net
> <mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net>] On
> Behalf Of Chris Chaundy
> > Sent: Wednesday, 1 October 2014 09:36
> > To: Joseph Goldman
> > Cc: AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
> > Subject: Re: [AusNOG] PIPE NSW Changing Details
> >
> > Dependent on your make of router, it may just be
> easier to change the MAC address for the interface
> on the new router to match the old router's one.
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> >> On 1 Oct 2014, at 9:15, Joseph Goldman
> <joe at apcs.com.au <mailto:joe at apcs.com.au>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi list,
> >>
> >> I am just wondering if this is normal - trying
> to change MAC address for router port after urgent
> change-over for our PIPE peering connection in
> NSW, request was sent through to the MACD team but
> they are telling me the request needs to be
> approved by their management and ETA is 3-5
> business days??
> >>
> >> I'm not a massive user of PIPE IX but I have
> now been without it for 24 hours and its looking
> like it could be another 48-72 hours before
> getting it back! For someone who might get a LOT
> of their traffic via PIPE IX this would be a
> pretty bad amount of downtime, as other transit
> links would have to pick up the slack.
> >>
> >> If any PIPE engineers on list willing to help
> the request move a little quicker I'd appreciate it.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Joe
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> AusNOG mailing list
> >> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
> >> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
> > _______________________________________________
> > AusNOG mailing list
> > AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
> > http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
> > _______________________________________________
> > AusNOG mailing list
> > AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
> > http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20141001/c1bc9ae8/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the AusNOG
mailing list