[AusNOG] PIPE DC's to allow Megaport!

[Quigg, Jamie]

Guys,

Pacnet’s DC’s are Carrier Neutral – we have multiple carriers terminating within our facility in Sydney.

Regards,


Jamie Quigg
Product Manager  | Managed Services | PACNET
T +613.9674.7631 | F +613.9698.4931 | M +61.434.306.228
www.pacnet.com<http://www.pacnet.com/>
Twitter: https://twitter.com/pacnet
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/pacnet<http://www.linkedin.com/company/pacnet>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail message contains information intended solely for the intended recipient and is confidential or private in nature. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not read, disseminate, distribute, copy or otherwise use this message or any file attached to this message. Any such unauthorized use is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by email, facsimile or telephone and then delete the original message from your machine.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



From: AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of Stephen Carter (FirstPath)
Sent: Friday, 23 May 2014 12:48 PM
To: Robert Hudson; Joshua D'Alton
Cc: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] PIPE DC's to allow Megaport!

Yes I can confirm from our experience that FirstPath installed in Pacnet 133 Liverpool a while ago and Pacnet were a pleasure to deal with and took a neutral position.


From: AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of Robert Hudson
Sent: Friday, 23 May 2014 12:43 PM
To: Joshua D'Alton
Cc: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net<mailto:ausnog at lists.ausnog.net>
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] PIPE DC's to allow Megaport!

PacNet do run DCs for customers, I have kit in their Sydney DC (133 Liverpool St).  I don't believe PacNet were blocking anything though - I've been told that MP is coming to PacNet's Sydney DC for a few months now (by both PacNet and MP staff).

On 23 May 2014 10:09, Joshua D'Alton <joshua at railgun.com.au<mailto:joshua at railgun.com.au>> wrote:
Congrats on the long slog Bevan and MP!

With this victory now, will it enable MP to enter even Telstra/Pacnet etc DCs now? Or is that.. not the same? I guess since PIPE/TPG operate DCs for customers, whereas Telstra/pacnet is purely internal/end user use?

On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Bevan Slattery <bevan at slattery.net.au<mailto:bevan at slattery.net.au>> wrote:
Thanks John.  I'd like to also thank the patient Megaport customers in PIPE (and a few other telco facilities) who continue to support our attempts to innovate.  I'd also like to thank the TIO.

Will post the full TIO determination once legal has given its blessing.  It makes great reading.

[b]

From: John Lindsay <johnslindsay at mac.com<mailto:johnslindsay at mac.com>>
Date: Friday, 23 May 2014 9:46 AM
To: Curtis Bayne <curtis at bayne.com.au<mailto:curtis at bayne.com.au>>
Cc: "ausnog at lists.ausnog.net<mailto:ausnog at lists.ausnog.net>" <ausnog at lists.ausnog.net<mailto:ausnog at lists.ausnog.net>>

Subject: Re: [AusNOG] PIPE DC's to allow Megaport!

And I just sent Bevan a note thanking him for once again doing the heavy lifting for the industry.
John Lindsay

On 22 May 2014, at 4:45 pm, Curtis Bayne <curtis at bayne.com.au<mailto:curtis at bayne.com.au>> wrote:
Beat me to it John. Low impact facilities just became a lot less hassle now someone else has spent the money establishing the precedent you can point to next time building management kicks up a fuss.

Thanks Megaport!

On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 9:43 AM, John Lindsay <johnslindsay at mac.com<mailto:johnslindsay at mac.com>> wrote:
Oooh yeeah, it's good.

This also means it will require legislative change to prevent a competitive FTTB operator from entering an apartment basement.
John Lindsay

On 22 May 2014, at 4:38 pm, Curtis Bayne <curtis at bayne.com.au<mailto:curtis at bayne.com.au>> wrote:
"Significantly, it confirmed that PIPE’s telehousing customers are regarded as “occupiers” of the building, and that Megaport can exercise its legal rights to install "in-building subscriber connection equipment” to supply them with competing services."
This is good. Very good.

On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Jared Hirst <jared.hirst at serversaustralia.com.au<mailto:jared.hirst at serversaustralia.com.au>> wrote:
For those that have been waiting to get Megaport in PIPE’s DC’s, it may now be possible (finally)!

http://www.megaport.com/blog/entry/megaport-wins-against-pipe-networks-at-the-tio.html

Cheers,

Jared

_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net<mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog

_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net<mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog

_______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net<mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog

_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net<mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog


_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net<mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20140523/9f78529b/attachment.html>