[AusNOG] another ipv6 Q

Skeeve Stevens skeeve+ausnog at eintellegonetworks.com
Thu Jul 3 10:35:33 EST 2014


This is a strange question.

One thing that some engineers don't seem to understand is that IPv4 and
IPv6 have absolutely nothing to do with each other.  At no point do they
communicate with each other unless some translation method is used... but
that method is doing the interpretation.

Even dual-stacking v4 and v6 on the same interface doesn't make them
interact in any way whatsoever.


...Skeeve

*Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd
skeeve at eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com

Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve

facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ;  <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>
linkedin.com/in/skeeve

twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com


The Experts Who The Experts Call
Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering


On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker <
Alex.Samad at yieldbroker.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> So we have a ipv4 class C assigned to us. What if any pitfalls are there
> for using the ipv4 in ipv6 address space ?
>
> Alex
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20140703/a50c4f60/attachment.html>


More information about the AusNOG mailing list