[AusNOG] another ipv6 Q

[Peter Tiggerdine]

because it's horribly supported and has no way to perform
deterministic routing because it's based on an anycast address.

To a traceroute to 192.88.99.1

On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker
<Alex.Samad at yieldbroker.com> wrote:
> Oops sorry being cryptic again
>
> So I have 202.74.32.0/24 this equates to 2002:ca4a:2000::/48  (6to4 seems to be the right acronym)
> Why don't I ( and other people who own ipv4 space) use this space ?
>
> Alex
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Peter Tiggerdine [mailto:ptiggerdine at gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, 3 July 2014 10:14 AM
>> To: Alex Samad - Yieldbroker
>> Cc: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
>> Subject: Re: [AusNOG] another ipv6 Q
>>
>> I'm not I understand what you're asking.. Do you means something like
>> 6to4 or 4to6?
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker
>> <Alex.Samad at yieldbroker.com> wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > So we have a ipv4 class C assigned to us. What if any pitfalls are there for
>> using the ipv4 in ipv6 address space ?
>> >
>> > Alex
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > AusNOG mailing list
>> > AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>> > http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog