[AusNOG] Charter Change ?

[Chris Legg]

I like this idea. I'm a newcomer, only been on the list 2.5 weeks and 
seeing more complaining about the list content than actual content.
If someone wants to ruin their reputation in the industry that's on 
them, but if you post public arguments you'll ruin the reputation of the 
list that you're so desperately trying to protect.
If you can't ignore it, deal with it off list please.

Chris


On 12/12/2014 6:16 AM, Christopher Mclean wrote:
> There is also the added tack that if everybody ignores (and I mean no comment) a post they believe is off topic or stupid the noise level will be reduced. 1 person posts a whirlpool comment and 45 people complain.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of Mike Everest
> Sent: Thursday, 11 December 2014 9:39 PM
> To: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
> Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Charter Change ?
>
> Good evening,  I reply to this thread with trepidation, hopeful that I don't end up perpetuating discussion along the lines of the one/s that initiated this ;)
>
>> Out of curiosity, if anyone feels there is too much traffic that may
> currently
>> within the charter of the group, but you think shouldn't be, how would
>> you change the charter?
> How about these two points to start with:
>
> 1) If you want to dis someone, be it legitimate or otherwise, send it direct to the person to whom you have your beef
> 	- I mean it's not like you reply-to-list accidentally, and I honestly have no interest in hearing about it :-}
>
> 2) If you receive direct reply from some other list recipient whingeing about your post, don't reply it to the list - EVER
> 	- man, replying any kind of personal email to a public list is, surely, incredibly poor form - no matter HOW stupid one thinks it will make the other person seem - and I have even LESS interest in hearing about THAT!
> :-D
>
> The above 2 behaviours simply bring no value to this list (IMHO) and so surely have no place here.
>
> I appreciate Terry's points about taking a light touch approach, but surely there are some simple rules that could easily be applied to a '3 strikes'
> type approach - the above as some examples :-}
>
> Cheers!
>
> Mike.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog