[AusNOG] Charter Change ?

[Joshua Riesenweber]

My 2c...
FWIW I do not run an ISP, ASP, or large DC; but I subscribe because I learn a lot by reading the discussions that go on here.  That being said, I can understand how frustrating it must be for people running service provider networks to see questions on the list about what are essentially end-user or even residential services.
Ignoring the few personal disagreements, I think there is a disconnect between the definitions in the charter and what people are posting. The charter is very clear around the level of discussion "...internet infrastructure related service providers (eg ISP/ASP/DC etc)".Asking subscribers to create an inbox rule to filter discussions that are not in the scope of the list does not seem like a solution.
I can't remember where I read it, but I recall someone joking that if you don't have an AS, then you shouldn't post. 
Long email, but to summarise...the question was raised about if/how the charter should be changed. I think the charter is very clear, but it is not being followed either due to individual interpretation or by choice .  

Just my thoughts.
Cheers,Josh

> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:35:35 +0800
> From: ausnog at digitaljunkie.net
> To: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
> Subject: [AusNOG] Charter Change ?
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Out of curiosity, if anyone feels there is too much traffic that may 
> currently within the charter of the group, but you think shouldn't be, 
> how would you change the charter?
> 
> Current charter: http://www.ausnog.net/mailing_list/charter
> 
> 
> prk.
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20141211/95d18694/attachment.html>