[AusNOG] (Meta-)Data Retention

[Bradley Amm]

Again Amazon Glaicer would be perfect for that purpose "Does it need to be backed up / Diverse / SLA ? ? What if it's hacked ?   Can I go to jail because ASIO want's something from 1.5 years ago and I go to get it and the disk's died."


Kind Regards

Bradley Amm
11 Delawney St Balcatta WA 6021
P 08 6241 4404 F 6241 4455 M 0448 815 710
W www.homegroupwa.com.au




-----Original Message-----
From: AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of Matt Perkins
Sent: Wednesday, 6 August 2014 1:31 PM
To: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] (Meta-)Data Retention

Im with Ross on this one. Let's give them a mirror port and they can make their own arrangement's the cost of this to most at the egress points would be minimal I would think.

Then <insert new agency> would need to build fiber to every ISP   and 
store it all. When the government say. We cant do that it's to expensive. Then they have made their own argument for why we cant do it .

Case solved.

I also wonder what the penalties are for loosing all this data. Does it 
need to be backed up / Diverse / SLA ? ? What if it's hacked ?   Can I 
go to jail because ASIO want's something from 1.5 years ago and I go to get it and the disk's died. ?

Matt.



  On 6/08/2014 1:38 pm, Ross Wheeler wrote:
>
>
>> So i see they keep saying data will be held for 2 years, does this 
>> include full url history as well? Because in the UK they went for 
>> just 4 days retention, presumably because of the absurd amount of 
>> data that would mean they would have to collect. Anyone have any idea 
>> how much data that would be? I suspect it is a great time to be a 
>> storage vendor.
>
> I wonder how we'd go... if we told 'em to "provide us an ethernet port 
> where we just squirt the data to" and let them concern themselves with 
> the cost and logistics of providing the bandwidth and storage.
>
> If they under-provision and lose data: problem belong them.
> If they have storage problems: problem belong them.
> If they have equipment breakdowns: problem belong them.
> If they can't read data due to encryption: problem belong them.
>
> Sell it to them on the grounds that they'd have the data in (near) 
> real-time.
>
> (Not that I agree with or support this nonsense idea in any way, shape 
> or form to begin with... just looking for a way for them to realise 
> themselves the enormity and futility of the task) 
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog

_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog