[AusNOG] Confirmation of govt blackholing. Was: Re: Understanding lack of Aus connectivity to melbournefreeuniversity.org.

[PRK]

All this does is pushes the same question, of how to determine
collateral damage, back one level to the requester. 

Add to that, if we can't take the original notice on faith, what
changes to suggest that we can take the third party estimate of
collateral damage on faith? 

prk. 

On 2013-05-16 18:12, Mark Newton wrote: 

> On 16/05/2013, at 17:30, PRK <ausnog at digitaljunkie.net> wrote:
> 
>> Out of curiosity, when the request to block an IP address comes through, how should the ISP determine whether it contains thousand of law abiding websites, child abuse material, or whatever?
> 
> You could start by asking the human being whose name and signature appears at the bottom of the notice. 
> 
> You're not suggesting that ISPs receiving notices from govt agencies should just be accepting them on faith, are you?

 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20130516/7e10787d/attachment.html>