[AusNOG] Fwd: Joint Committee on Intelligence & Security Report out

[Matt Perkins]

Cant they just ask the US government for a copy from Prism will save us 
a heap of cash. :)

Matt.


  On 24/06/13 11:11 AM, Narelle wrote:
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *Narelle Clark, President ISOC-AU* <president at isoc-au.org.au 
> <mailto:president at isoc-au.org.au>>
> Date: Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:09 AM
> Subject: Joint Committee on Intelligence & Security Report out
>
>
>
>
> See:
> http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/House_of_Representatives_Committees?url=pjcis/nsl2012/report.htm 
>
>
>
> GEN: Parliamentary committee dodges data retention decision
>
> JAMES HUTCHINSON
>
> A long-awaited decision on whether the federal government should 
> implement a mandatory data retention regime has been sidelined by a 
> parliamentary committee tasked to look at the contentious matter.
>
> The joint intelligence and security committee, which was tasked by 
> former Attorney-general Nicola Roxon in May last year to consider 
> security reform, said that whether a regime should be put in place was 
> "ultimately a decision for government".
>
> The regime was one of 44 proposals put forward by the 
> Attorney-General's Department and security agencies last year as the 
> committee looked at whether to reform national security legislation.
>
> If put in place, it would force telecommunications companies like 
> Telstra to hold metadata like phone call records and IP addresses on 
> Australians for up to two years.
>
> Federal, state and local government agencies accessed metadata more 
> than 300,000 times during the last financial year, but agencies have 
> argued that this type of information is increasingly unavailable.
>
> The proposal attracted the ire of civil liberties groups and the 
> Greens, which argued that the warrantless system infringed on the 
> privacy of Australian citizens.
>
> Though the committee did not make a decision on the matter, it urged 
> the government to publish draft legislation on the proposal that would 
> ensure that security agencies are unable to access the actual content 
> of communications without a warrant.
>
> It also said any legislation should ban agency access to internet 
> browsing data like website addresses, and that the government should 
> reimburse telecommunications companies for the cost of establishing 
> such a system; a key sticking point for companies like iiNet.
>
> More to come
>
> from:
>
> http://www.afr.com/p/technology/parliamentary_committee_dodges_data_FuIjuqFrH5NvYp7Rv77xpK
>
>
>
>
> -- 
>
>
> Narelle Clark
> President
> Internet Society of Australia
> ph: 0412 297 043
> int ph: +61 412 297 043 <tel:%2B61%20412%20297%20043>
> president at isoc-au.org.au <mailto:president at isoc-au.org.au>
> www.isoc-au.org.au <http://www.isoc-au.org.au>
> The Internet is for Everyone!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
>
>
> Narelle
> narellec at gmail.com <mailto:narellec at gmail.com>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog


-- 
/* Matt Perkins
         Direct 1300 137 379     Spectrum Networks Ptd. Ltd.
         Office 1300 133 299     matt at spectrum.com.au
         Fax    1300 133 255     Level 6, 350 George Street Sydney 2000
         SIP 1300137379 at sip.spectrum.com.au
         PGP/GNUPG Public Key can be found at  http://pgp.mit.edu
*/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20130624/adcd26dc/attachment.html>