[AusNOG] Fwd: LulzSec Leader Arrested in Sydney - One of our

[Joshua D'Alton]

We'll probably get the stop thread message soon if we continue discussion
on this, annnnd, I'm still amused at how/why people think the new list will
be closed to the 'public'. It takes 5 minutes to setup an email pipe to
replicate the 'private' content elsewhere. (not saying I'd be the one to do
it, or that anyone would even bother given how little posts there'll ever
be on the list, but whatever).


On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Jared Hirst <
jared.hirst at serversaustralia.com.au> wrote:

> True, was more pointing out that the points raised on the other discussion
> could very well be valid about having a closed list (noglist), however
> could also be co-incidence! I was just pointing it out :)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Damian Guppy [mailto:the.damo at gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2013 6:14 PM
> To: Jared Hirst; Tim March; ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
> Subject: RE: [AusNOG] Fwd: LulzSec Leader Arrested in Sydney - One of our
>
> That, or possibly, news.com.au got the pastebins from the same source that
> the person who posted it to the list got them from, its not like they were
> some top secret documents if you know where your looking (twitter).
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone From: Jared Hirst
> Sent: 27/04/2013 4:11 PM
> To: Tim March; ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
> Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Fwd: LulzSec Leader Arrested in Sydney - One of our
> Just the e-mails that went around the other day with the links to
> pastebin, News.com.au then referenced to pastebin and had the article
> written just after the exchange of Ausnog e-mails on the matter.
>
> May have been co-incidence!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net
> [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of Tim March
> Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2013 6:08 PM
> To: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
> Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Fwd: LulzSec Leader Arrested in Sydney - One of our
>
>
> On 27/04/13 5:54 PM, Jared Hirst wrote:
> > And it would appear that the source of their info came from this list
> > (possibly)
>
> Not sure if I'm missing something - what are you basing this statement on,
> specificall?
>
>
> T.
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20130427/49fdcaab/attachment.html>