[AusNOG] Moderated/Vetted AusNOG list to reduce the guff (was Re: Understanding lack of Aus connectivity to melbournefreeuniversity.org.)

[Joshua D'Alton]

The problem with that is it might take 3 hours to get a post moderated. I'd
say that is a long time for networks to not be able to 'fix' things. People
probably wouldn't bother and would just use IRC or skype or plain email to
the contacts they've found through ausnog.

Are there really that many threads (not posts, threads) on here taking up
peoples time to the extent they feel this is necessary?

On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Phillip Grasso <phillip.grasso at gmail.com>wrote:

> Most of topics aren't unreasonable, thoughts on setup a smaller list that
> is concentrated / moderated etc.
>
> I like the format
>
> ausnog (mostly network operators).
> ausnog-ops (moderated list australian network operators).
> ausnog-jobs (jobs posting).
> ausnog-trades (sales/buying, trades, borrowing parts etc).
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Mark Smith <markzzzsmith at yahoo.com.au>wrote:
>
>> Once off vetting, and then having people control themselves is going to
>> be far less moderation effort than having a small set of moderators have to
>> read each and every email and hit some of them on the head. The threat of
>> losing your privilege of being able to participate should be enough to
>> make people moderate themselves, or quickly stop if they are told by others
>> that they've crossed the line.
>>
>> If issues such as this one need to get into the public domain, they will
>> indirectly.
>>
>>   ------------------------------
>>  *From:* James Hodgkinson <yaleman at ricetek.net>
>> *To:* "ausnog at lists.ausnog.net" <ausnog at lists.ausnog.net>
>> *Sent:* Sunday, 14 April 2013 8:49 AM
>> *Subject:* Re: [AusNOG] Understanding lack of Aus connectivity to
>> melbournefreeuniversity.org.
>>
>> No reason to start a new list or "vet" people onto it, just get some
>> moderators who slap down threads and make sure it stays on-topic :)
>>
>> James
>>
>>
>> On 13 April 2013 18:28, Bevan Slattery <bevan at slattery.net.au> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> From: McDonald Richards <McDonald.Richards at vocus.com.au>
>> Date: Saturday, 13 April 2013 5:39 PM
>> To: Danny O'Brien <danny at spesh.com>
>> Cc: "ausnog at lists.ausnog.net" <ausnog at lists.ausnog.net>, Nathan Nogic <
>> nathan at mds.au.com>
>>
>> Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Understanding lack of Aus connectivity to
>> melbournefreeuniversity.org.
>>
>> > The lack of response is less about conspiracy and more about apathy.
>>
>> Yeah – However, my apathy is not because of journos but because Ausnog is
>> no longer a network operators group, but a splinter of Whirlpool.
>>
>> It feeling like trying to have an discussion of the NBN in a Whirlpool
>> thread in 2010/11.  Anyone for a true Network Operators Group email list?
>>  This is just tiring and filling up my inbox…
>>
>> [b]
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AusNOG mailing list
>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AusNOG mailing list
>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AusNOG mailing list
>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20130414/8d7f52a8/attachment.html>