[AusNOG] Domestic Peering WAS: Vocus peering traffic missingfrom PIPE-IX?

[Mark Prior]

AARNet met Verizon's requirements and got peering with them. I believed 
we also met AAPT's until AAPT changed their policy.

Mark.

On 12/11/12 3:18 PM, Chris Ricks wrote:
> With that said (AS703s requirements being met by AAPT, Optus and
> Telstra), is it likely that any other Australian carrier would be likely
> to meet them as well?
>
>
> On 12/11/12 15:32, Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote:
>> On 11/11/2012, at 8:29 PM, Chris Ricks <chris.ricks at securepay.com.au> wrote:
>>
>>> There's been on list discussion stating that if the other 3 members of
>>> the GoF were evaluated using Verizon's published policy, they wouldn't
>>> get to keep the current arrangement - do you have an opinion on that
>>> either way?
>>>
>> I'd suggest that untrue.  All would meet AS703s requirements.
>>
>> MMC
>>
>>> On 12/11/12 15:13, Mark Prior wrote:
>>>> On 12/11/12 12:25 PM, Chris Ricks wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Even if a merger of M2, iiNet and TPG occurred, their traffic volume
>>>>> would not put them in a position to discuss settlement-free or SKA
>>>>> peering with any of the GoF without government intervention - that is
>>>>> the crux of the issue here.
>>>> I wouldn't put Verizon in the same box as the other three. They have a
>>>> written peering policy and if you satisfy the policy via a test
>>>> peering then you get to keep it.
>>>>
>>>> AAPT had a policy (I wrote the first version :-) but it's a moving
>>>> target, at least it was when I last tried to use it to get peering.
>>>> Telstra's peering policy is mission impossible and Optus can't spell
>>>> peering.
>>>>
>>>> Mark.
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> AusNOG mailing list
>>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>
>
>